Webster v. George Druillard
View original image: Page  001
[missing figure]

In the court of common pleas of the District of
S LouisS Louis of the term of July in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and nine St LouisSt Louis
District .

Webster plaintiff complains of GeorgeGeorge Druillard DruillardGeorge Druillard
defendant of a plea of trespasson the case for that
whereas the said defendant and the first day of June, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and nine at the town of S. LouisS Louis
in the District of S. LouisS Louis and within the jurisdiction
of this court made his certain promissory note in
writing, hearing date the day and year aforesaid, and
there then delivered the said state to said plaintiff
and thereby in the words and figures following
to Wit. " S LouisS LouisJune 1st 1809.â

âdue or demand eighty five
dollars 62 cents on settlementâ

âGet "GeorgeGeorge Druillard DruillardGeorge Druillard â


demand
by reason whereof and by force of the statute in
case made and provided he the said defendant
liable to pay to the said plaintiff the said sum mentioned in
the said Note according to the tenor and effect of said Note
and being so liable he's the said defendant in consideration
thereof of the courts to wit-on the same day in the year at the
places and within the jurisdiction aforesaid undertook and
there then faithfully promised the said plaintiff to pay him the
said sum of money mentioned in the said note according to the said defendant
the time and effect of the said note and whereas afterwards
to wit-on the same day and year at the places and within
the jurisdiction last aforesaid was indebted to the said plain-
tiff in the sum of one hundred dollars for money by
the said plaintiff before that time said laid out and ex-
pended for the said defendant at his special instance
and request and for other money before that time had and
received by the said defendant to the use of said plaintiff
and for other money by the said plaintiff before then

View original image: Page  002
[missing figure]
advanced to the said defendant at his like instance and
request and being so indebted to the Defendant in consideration
thereof aforesaid to Writ-and the same day and year at the
places and within the jurisdiction last aforesaid under
took and there then faithfully promised the said plaintiff
to pay him said sum of money last mentioned when he
should be there to afterwards requested yet the said defendant
after requested has not paid the several sums of
money requested there of to the said plaintiff but to pay
the same or any part thereof to the said plaintiff has he then
refused and still refuse to the said plaintiff
his damage of One hundred and twenty five
dollars. - - - - - - - - -- --
and therefore he bring his writ

R. Baston