Henly Donnelson vs. Missouri Fur Company
View original image: Page  001
[missing figure]

District of St LouisSt Louis in the com-
mon pleas of the term of November in the year of our Lord one thousand eight Hundred and ten

District of St LouisSt Louis

Henly Donnolson by
his attor
ney complains of Wm -
August - Manuel Lesaw - Benjamin Wilkin
son- AndrewAndrew Henry HenryAndrew Henry - Louis - and
by the name and state of the St LouisSt Louis for Company of a plea of
on the case for that whereas the said defend
ants on the nineteenth day of april in the year of our said one thousand eight hundred and nine at St LouisSt Louis in the Dis
trict of St LouisSt Louis and within the
of this Court by A. P. their agent
made a certain writen agreement with the
said plaintiff and then and there delivered
the said agreement to the said plaintiff
by virtue thereof and by of the force of the statute in such case made and they the said
defendants became to pay to the said
plaintiff five hundred dollars and being so
liable they the said defendants in con
sideration thereof after ward to will on the
same day and year at the place and within
jurisdiction last aforesaid under took and
then these forthfully promised to pay to
the said Plaintiff five hundred dollars
when they afterward requested

And where as afterwards trait on the
same day and year at the place and within
the jurisdiction last aforesaid they the said
defendants was to the said plaintiff

in the same of five hundred dollars for work

View original image: Page  002
[missing figure]
and labour case and diligence of him the
said Plaintiff in and about the said business of
the said defendants fame performed and
to the said defendants by the said Plaintiff
at the special instance and request of the said
defenants and being so they the
the said defendants in consideration there of
then and these faithfully promised to pay to
the said plaintiff five hundred dollars when
they he these unto afterwords requested

And whereas afterward, the same
day and year at the place and within the
last aforesaid in consideraton that
the said plaintiff at the like instance
and request of the said defendants would
in to the service of the said St LouisSt Louis MissouriMissouri fair company they the said defendants then and
there faithfully to furnish to the
said plaintiff an equipment such as
or custom any for and hunting or to
pay to the said plaintiff five hundred dollars
when they should he there to afterwards requested
and the said plaintiff that he did enter
in to the and remain for the
term of one year from the date of the in
statement here with filed

And whereas afterwards trait on the
same day and year at the place and
within the jurisdiction last aforesaid in considera
tion that the said plaintiff at the like instance
of the said defendants would enter into
the service of the said company they the said
defendants faithfully promised then and
there to pay to the said plaintiff so much
money as he the said Plaintiff stand there
for reasonably deserve to have and the
said Plaintiff that he did enter into the