Peter Primm vs. John Lane, James Mackey, John Bolly, and Jeduthan Kendal
View original image: Page  033
[missing figure]

Between PeterPeter Primm Plaintiff
and JeduthanJeduthan Kendal KendalJeduthan Kendal Defendant

The replication of PeterPeter Primmcomplainant against
JeduthanJeduthan Kendal KendalJeduthan Kendal , JamesJames Mackey MackeyJames Mackey , John BollyJohn Bolly and
John LaneJohn Lane to the several answer of JeduthanJeduthan Kendal KendalJeduthan Kendal Defendant.

This repliantsaving and reserving to himself all
and all manner of advantage of exception to the manifold
insufficiencies of the said answer, for replication thereunto saith, that he will aver and prove his said Bill to
be true, certain and sufficient in the law to be answered
unto, and that the said answer of the defendant is uncertain,
untrue and insufficient to be replied into by this repliant,
without that, that any other matter or thing whatsoever in the
said answer contained, material or effectual in the law to be
replied unto, confessed and avoided, traversed or denied, is true
all which matters and things this repliant is and will be ready
to aver and prove as this honorable court shall direct,
and humbly prays as in and by his said bill he hath
already prayed.

View original image: Page  034
[missing figure]

PeterPeter Primm
JeduthanJeduthan Kendal KendalJeduthan Kendal
Replication in Chancery

filed March 22d 1816

J. VJ V Garnier . GarnierJ V Garnier