Peter Primm vs. John Lane, James Mackey, John Bolly, and Jeduthan Kendal
View original image: Page  035
[missing figure]

Between PeterPeter Primm Plaintiff and
JamesJames Mackey MackeyJames Mackey Defendant

The Replication of PeterPeter Primm complaint against
JeduthanJeduthan Kendal KendalJeduthan Kendal , James Mackay and John BollyJohn Bolly and
John LaneJohn Lane to the several answer of James Mackay
Defendant

This Repliant saving and reserving to
himself all and all manner of advantage of exception
to the manifold insufficiencies of the said answer, for replication
thereunto saith, that he will aver and prove his
said bill to be true, certain and sufficient in the law to be
answered into, and that the said answer of the defendant
is uncertain, untrue, and insufficient to be replied unto
by this repliant without that, that any other matter or
thing whatsoever in the said answer contained, material
or effectual in the law to be replied unto, confessed avoided,
traversed or denied, is true; all which matters and
things this repliant is and will be ready to aver and prove
as this honorable court shall direct, and humbly prays
as in and by his bill aforesaid he hath already prayed

View original image: Page  036
[missing figure]

PeterPeter Primm
vs
JamesJames Mackey MackeyJames Mackey
Replication in chancery

filed March 22nd 1816

J. VJ V Garnier . GarnierJ V Garnier
clk