Estate of Gabriel Cerre by August Chouteau, Exceutor v. Antoine Delard
View original image: Page  003
[missing figure]

Delard ads. Cerri

1. Plea.
Stat. Lim
and the said Antoine Delard by his
a attorney, wives is and defind the and inquiry
where & where . and the said
chartow of the said gabrielpierre, ought not
to have a maintain his said thing
against him, because he , that the said
cause of action in the said declaration mention
ed did not accused to the said plaintiff at
any time in their five years before the exhibition
of the fill of he said plff against him in
this behalf, in manner and form as the
said plaintiff hath above thereof complained
against him the said continue : and
this he is ready to verify: wherefore he prays
judgement if the said auguste choteau his
action aforesaid thereof against him ought
to have and maintain.

2. Plea
Sol. ad
diem.
and for further plea in this behalf according
to the statute in that case made and provided
the said by this said comes and
definds the and injury where and when
. and says the said august
. of the said G. ought not to have
or maintain his said action thereof against
him, because he says that he the said action
Deland on the seventeenth day of June in the year are thousand seven hundred and ninety three

View original image: Page  004
[missing figure]
at the County of St. LouisCounty of St Louis,
to the said care she said
of among mentioned in the declaration
of the said request choteau against
him, according to the from and effect
of the said from is therein
named and this he is readyto verify
wherefore he judgment of the
said august choteau ought to have
as maintain his aforesaid
thereof against him.

3. Plea.
Sol. post
diem.
and the said Deland for further
plea in this behalf avoiding to the
stated in that case made and founded
by his said . and defind the
among and where and where
and says the said plff his action above
said therefore against him ought not
to have or maintain. Because he
says, that he said antoine Deland
after the said seventeenth day of June in the year one thousand and seven hundred and ninety three, to wit, on the tenth day of May in the year one thousand seven hundred and ninety five, at the
county of St. LouisSt Louis, paid to the said
submit here the said sum of money
mentioned in the plaintiff declaration