David Stone Co. et. al. v. Executors of Manuel Lisa et. al.
View original image: Page  035
[missing figure]

answer to the first

As Manuel LisaManuel Lisa
in his will refered to an agreement that
had been previously entered into between
him & Mr Bostwich- it was necessary to
what the agreement was & without
such proof the mortgage itself is not to be
taken as evidence that the mortgage
was in conformity with the contact
of there he other evidence of what the
the consideration 4.18 was was
differing from that set out in the
deed â

2 my If the Execution in the mortgage
deed exceeded the power given to
them the mortgage is void 464 & the
at law & the Plaintiff 4676 cannot
recover in this action â

View original image: Page  036
[missing figure]

the time of the delivery of the Furs but
not afterwards