St LouisSt Louis. Nov. Term 1826.
WinneWinne
vs.
Levi Pettitione Michael Lanford
Theresa
his wife and
others St. Louis Circuit CourtCircuit Court Nov. Term
1826
Be it remembered that on the trial of
this case the plaintiff winne proved that some time about
the year one
thousand seven hundred ninety two one JohnJohn Whitset
WhitsetJohn Whitset
came to the now state of IllinoisIllinois and brought with
him
said winne then twelve or fourteen years of age hol
ding her as a
slave; also then bringing with him his
son ThomasWhitset
then aged about eight years; that
said John resided three or four
years at a place in the
now state of IllinoisIllinois
called WhitesidesWhitesides , station and then
removed into MissouriMissouri in 1796 where he afterwards died, the said
WinneWinne having all
that time been held as slave and
said ThomasThomas having rendered with
his father John Whit
set during that time said ThomasThomas also with his father
during all the time
of said Johns residence in the then
North west Territory that
on the morning Whitset was
removing
to LouisianaLouisiana the inhabitants of the stationtalked
of here from taking plantiff out
of
the territory. The plaintiff
gave nothing for
in evidence material to the point of law
raised
to the admission of the testimony hereinafter
specified. The defendents then
introduced a witness
who stated that he was
at WhitesidesWhitesides , station afore
said in
the fall of the year 1794 and shortly
afterwards
had a conversation with said John whitset,
and said John then and there
said
before said John came onto
country and while he resided
in Georgia he went to VirginiaVirginia, to
see
the father in
of said John who
then a deed of gift of said girl
WinneWinne
to his son the said ThomasThomas ;
and that that was all
the said father in law did for them although
his
said John's house had just been burnt down with
his
property; and he had thereupon gone to his said father
in laws to
obtain assistance. The plaintiff's counsel
moved to exclude the declarations of said Whitset in
relation
to the said deed of gift from the counsel
did and decided that the said declarations aforesaid
should not go to the Jury: and they were accor
dingly excluded, To which opinion of the court
the defendants counsel excepted andprayed the
court to sign this his bill of exceptions which
is done accordingly.
WillWill : C. CarrCarr


