vs Claiboure
Be A that on the
trial of this
each it was on the
part of the
prisoner that in the year 1821
he was brought to this state byMrs. Rad-
ford, that he was the
property of her late
husband who
left three
children
then
and now living- that in said year
Mrs. Radford intermarried
with Gene
-ral
Clark that since that time he
was occasionally
hired out for the
benefit of the
of Radford that
at the times when he was not hired out
he resided as
the of General Clark
who
received Control over him. That he
had
occasionally been hired out by General Clark, that
the
arising from the hire had
been
applied to the benefit of the
of Radford by the
guardian of the of Radford
of property in the slave being offered her
prisoner by his Councilasked the Court
to instruct the Jury that if they believed
the prisoner was not the property of
William ClarkWilliam Clark as stated in the in-
dictment they ought to find the
not which instruction
the Court refused to give to which
opinion the prisoner by his Council
Excepts and prop that this ex-
ception may be signed and
made a fact of the Record in
this Court which is done
The court decided that the evidence or proved
a qualified property in
William ClarkWilliam Clark
Which was sufficientto
sustain the Indict
ment & that ground
refused the in
struction.
WillWill . C. CarrCarr


