of DavidDavid Cunningham CunninghamDavid Cunningham decd
vs
William SubletteWilliam Sublette
Be it remembered that at the trial of this
cause, the plaintiff, to
prove the issues on his
part, gave in
evidence the letters of administration
of JosephJoseph Cunningham CunninghamJoseph Cunningham on the estate
of DavidDavid Cunningham
CunninghamDavid Cunningham (which being regular
& sufficient
to prove the issue for the plaintiff, it is
agreed shall
not be inserted) Also
the deposition of Orville
Shanks as follows (-insert it-) And the
testimony of WilliamWilliam H
AshleyH Ashley , of the
following purport -
Jedediah S. Smith, DavidDavid E
EDavid E . JacksonJackson ,
and WilliamWilliam L Sublette
composes
the firm of Smith JacksonJackson & Sublette - who
were
engaged in the fur trade in the extreme west.
The partnership began in July or August in
1826, and as witness has
understood
in the fall of 1830, or spring of
1831. Witness
attended to the pecuniary
interests of the firm at
St LouisSt Louis - received the return furs sold
them
- paid over money Witness does not personally
know that DavidDavid Cunningham CunninghamDavid Cunningham was in the
service
of the firm, but understood that
he was, heard it from various
persons &
thinks from some of the members of the
firm
- that he went with MrSmithSmith to
CaliforniaCalifornia or
in that direction, & was engaged
in that expedition
when he was killed - that
he was employed as a hired man that in
October 1830, at the house of Witness, in
St LouisSt Louis,
a settlement was made between JosephJoseph Cunningham
CunninghamJoseph Cunningham
admr, of DavidDavid Cunningham CunninghamDavid Cunningham
present but is not sure as to SubletteSublette - Did not
not pay particular attention to the settlement,
as he had nothing to do with it except that he
paid the money, when the balance was struck
receipt given. He identifies the receipt in
the following words " St. LouisSt Louis - Received the
ânineteenth day of October AD 1830 from
âSmith JacksonJackson & Sublette, the sum of two
âhundred and Fifty dollars, in full of all
"demands of DavidDavid Cunningham CunninghamDavid Cunningham deceased
âas settlement - JosephJoseph Cunningham CunninghamJoseph Cunningham
Administrator â
& proves the body of it to be in the handwriting of
JedediahSmithSmith . The witness does not
believe
that any regular books of accounts, were provided
at the
settlement - Had understood that most
of the papers of the firm had
been
destroyed
by the indians in the mountains. He
states that D. Cunningham
was at one time
in his employ in the fur trade in the mountains
in
1824 - understood that he afterwards
did
business as a free man - that is on his
own account. Persons dealing in
that way
usually get their outfits from the
larger
regular traders, consiting of horses traps
&
goods, amounting commonly to about $ 500
The defendant gave in evidence the
receipt above mentioned, and the
deposition
of Robert Evans as follows (here insert the
deposition) - And no further evidence
was given on either side
Neither party requring a jury, the court refered
the cause to three
auditors, and the evidence being
submitted to them; and thereupon the court
instructed the auditors that
"there is no


