Francisco Corella vs. Benjamin L.E. Bonneville, Joseph Powell, Peter Powell
View original image: Page  023
[missing figure]

State of MissouriMissouri
CountyCounty Saint Louis of Saint LouisCircuit Court

Saint LouisCounty Saint LouisCircuit CourtCircuit Court
March Term AD 1836

Francisco CorellaFrancisco Corella
vs
BenjaminBenjamin L E BonnevilleL E Bonneville

SsPeter PowellPeter Powell sum
moned as Garnishee with Joseph PowellJoseph Powell to answer Allegations &
Interrogations filed & exhibited in the above entitled cause according
to and by virtue of the Statute in such case made and provided
first being duly sworn for answer makes the following statements
in oath:

For Answer to the first Allegation; he says, that as the
time the said Peter Powell & Joseph Powell were summoned as
Garnishees in this suit, they were not indebted to the said Defend
ant BenjaminBenjamin L. E. BonnevilleL E Bonneville in the sum of two thousand dollars
for goods wares & merchandise beaver, beaver traps fur or other
matters purchased by them of said Defendant before that time.

For Answer to the Second Allegation; he says that at the time
said Garnishee aforesaid were summoned as such they were not
indebted to the aforesaid BenjaminBenjamin L. E. BonnevilleL E Bonneville the defendant
in the sum of two thousand dollars for land sold and conveyed goods
wares our marchandise sold & delivered or for notes bonds, accounts
or other in action assigned by the Defendant aforesaid to the
said Garnishees.

For answer to the Third Allegation, he says that when said
Garnishees were summoned as such as aforesaid they had not in
their possession cusstudy or charge lands tenements money, goods
wares & merchandise fur and be beaver notes bonds bills and
accounts belonging to said BenjaminBenjamin L. E. BonnevilleL E Bonneville to a large
amount and of great value, to wit of the value of two thousand
dollars.

For answer to the fourth Allegation, he said that there
havenot come to the hands of the said Garnishees since they
were to summoned as aforesaid moneys, goods, chattels credits
and effects of said Defendant aforesaid of great value to wit of
the value of two thousand dollars: And the above named PeterPeter Powell
PowellPeter Powell according to the tenour of the said Plaintiffs prayer makes
the above statements under oath in answer to the allegations find
and exhibited in the above entitled suit: And for answer to the sev
eral Interrogatories which the said plaintiff prays the said Garni
shees aforesaid may be compelled on their oaths fully to answer the
said Peter PowellPeter Powell makes the following further statements under
oath.

For answer to the first Interrogatory; he says that when

View original image: Page  024
[missing figure]
summoned as Garnishees in this suit neither was the said PeterPeter Powell
PowellPeter Powell , nor were the said Peter PowellPeter Powell and Joseph PowellJoseph Powell , nor as far as he
knows either of them alone or with others indebted to the said Defendant alone or to the said
defendant with others for goods wares and merchandise fur beaver
beaver traps, or other matters purchased by him, or them, or as far
as he knows either of them alone or him, or them, or as far as he knows
either of them with others from the above named defendant alone
or said defendant with others in the seven of two thousand dollars
Nor did he, or they, or as far as he knows either of there alone or
with others our the said defendant alone or the said defendant
with others any sum or amount whatever.

For answer to the Second Interrogatory; he says that when
summoned as Garnishees as aforesaid neither has he the said
Peter PowellPeter Powell , nor were they the said Peter PowellPeter Powell and Joseph PowellJoseph Powell
nor as far as he knows was either of them above or with others in
debted to the said Defendant alone or to the said Defendant with
others as stated in the said Plaintiffs second allegation. Nor in any
other manner or way nor be any other means was he, or they, or as
far as he knows either of them indebted above, or with others to the
said Defendant above or with others in any sum or amount whatsoever.

For Answer to the Third Interrogatory; he says that
when summoned as such Garnishees as aforesaid neither was he
the said Peter PowellPeter Powell nor were they the said Peter PowellPeter Powell and JosephJoseph Powell
PowellJoseph Powell , nor as far as he knows was either of them indebted alone or with
others to the above defendant or to the above defendant with
others: that neither had he the said Peter PowellPeter Powell nor they the
said Peter Powell & Joseph Powell, nor, as far as he knows either
of them alone or with others in the possession, custody or charge of
him the said Peter PowellPeter Powell or them the said Peter PowellPeter Powell and
Joseph PowellJoseph Powell , or, as far as he knows either of them alone or with
others the lands, property and effects of said Defendant or of said
Defendant with others as mentioned in the plaintiffs Fourth
allegation. And the said Peter PowellPeter Powell states, that neither had he,
nor the said Peter PowellPeter Powell and Joseph PowellJoseph Powell , nor, as far as he
knows either of them, then alone or with others any property or ef
fects in the possession, custody or charge of him, them, or as far as
he knows either of them alone or with others, belonging to the said
Defendant, or to the said Defendant with others.

For Answer to the Fourth Interoogatory; he says, that there
have not come into the possession, custody or charge of him the
said Peter PowellPeter Powell , or them the said Peter PowellPeter Powell and Joseph PowellJoseph Powell
or, as far as he knows either of them alone or with others since they
were summoned as such Garnishes, goods, chattels, credits, moneys