LET'S JUMP BACK TO THE SUPREME COURT AGAIN. I WASN'T GOING TO ASK THIS, BUT YOU STARTED TO TALK ABOUT IT JUST BEFORE. I'M WONDERING IF YOU COULD GIVE US WHAT YOUR SENSE WAS OF THE CHANGE IN THE COURT WITH THE NEW, WITH THE NEW CHIEF JUSTICE. DID YOU HAVE A SENSE OF THAT?
Whether I sensed a change in the uh, Court generally, because of the change in the Chief Justiceship between the two arguments, is something I really can't comment about. I guess the answer is I did not have any sense that the Court's disposition generally had changed.