Eyes on the Prize One Interviews
Washington University Digital Gateway Texts
Interview with William Lucy

View Item

Interviewer: Paul Steckler
Production Team: D
Interview Date: October 24, 1988

Camera Rolls: 4020-4023
Sound Rolls: 407-408

Editorial Notes:


Interview with , conducted by Blackside, Inc. on October 24, 1988, for . Washington University Libraries, Film and Media Archive, Henry Hampton Collection. These transcripts contain material that did not appear in the final program. Only text appearing in bold italics was used in the final version of

QUESTION 1

PAUL STECKLER: How did you first get involved with the strike? How did it first happen?
WILLIAM LUCY: Well, the, ah, strike came about essentially because of the, I guess, frustration of the men. Ah, I, at that time, was assigned to the city of Detroit, ah, doing some organizational work. Ah, I got a call from the President, who had got a call from a newspaper reporter, in effect, telling him or raising the question as to what we knew about, ah, what was about to take place in the city of Memphis. Ah, I was from Memphis and therefore the President thought I might be of some use, ah, down there. Ah, and he asked if I would go down and just be a part of trying to bring the thing together. Ah, I did, ah, met one or two of other staff people down there that to us seemed like a fairly simple dispute that could've been settled relatively easy. And this was early, oh, about mid-February, 1968. And, ah, in our opinion it was a simple issue if we had been working with a city, ah, or administration that had some understanding of the day to day problems of workers in these particular categories, and had a willingness to sit down and sort of address those problems.

QUESTION 2

PAUL STECKLER: Were you surprised that the men there, in particular, struck?
WILLIAM LUCY: Yeah, I was quite surprised, ah, the, the, the strike was, was, was an accumulation of grievances that had not been addressed. Ah, the men were not the typical militants that you would see in, ah, in, militant union activity. These were 55, 60 year old men who had spent the better part of their life, ah, at least their work life, working for the city of Memphis, in what essentially had to be the most unskilled profession that you could imagine. So they were not eager to strike, they were not eager to make any statement. They were simply were looking for a resolution to some of the outstanding grievances that they had for some time.

QUESTION 3

PAUL STECKLER: So how did you first become aware of the strike?
WILLIAM LUCY: Ah, President Wurf, ah, had received a phone call, or at least an inquiry from a newspaper reporter asking, ah, him, ah, if the union was in fact planning and organizing a strike in the city of Memphis. Ah, it came as quite a surprise to, ah, to President Wurf, ah, simply because in February nobody has a strike in Memphis, Tennessee. Ah, he called me at that time, I was assigned to Detroit, ah, and asked if, ah, if I, if I had time to go down and meet one of our other staff people to see if we could lend some support to bringing this to a, ah, to a conclusion. To us it was a fairly simple matter, ah, when we arrived, it seemed like it was a disagreement over grievances, and, ah, we thought any administration or city government, ah, could settle these kinds of differences relatively quickly.

QUESTION 4

PAUL STECKLER: And you were a union representative at that time?
WILLIAM LUCY: At that time I was assistant, ah, director of the department of, legi- legislation and a community affairs, associate director. I had been assigned to Detroit on a particular, ah, unique organizing effort.

QUESTION 5

PAUL STECKLER: So in one sentence you were working for who as what?
WILLIAM LUCY: Working for, uh--
PAUL STECKLER:
WILLIAM LUCY: I was working for President Wurf as Associate Director of the Department of Legislation and Community Affairs.

QUESTION 6

PAUL STECKLER: What happened when Loeb first, well, what were your first impressions?
WILLIAM LUCY: Ah, I was struck, ah, by, by, by the mayor, ah, as a rather unique individual. At that time, Memphis had just come through a, a, a new election, a, an election that had involved the restructuring of city government, ah, and the election of a new city council, and the election of a strong mayor. Ahh, Mayor Loeb was, was, was a rather large, ah, man, sort of a John Wayne type, John Wayne mentality. Ah, six foot five or six, um, very impressed with not only himself but his station in life. And a stubborn, ah, man, one who, I think generally felt, ah, warm towards people, but in much more of a paternalistic sense as opposed to a relationship of peers on the basis of just human beings.

QUESTION 7

PAUL STECKLER: What was it like when you first, when you were there when he first met with the workers?
WILLIAM LUCY: I was there when he, when we first came to, ah, to just take a look at what the problem was, uh. We had met with him prior to his meeting with the men, ah, to try and, and point out the safety concerns that the men had, ah, the problems of discrimination with regards to the assignment of work on the critical day that it rained and they were sent home. Ah, and his reaction was, as far as he was concerned, the union really didn't represent anybody, at least in his estimation. Ah, so we decided that we would go back and inform the men of his position, ah, and ask them, you know, what we should do. And we went back to the Rubber Workers hall, where there was a meeting in progress. A, an instant decision was made to bring the men downtown to see the mayor. Ah, and so we marched from the union hall, ah, across the city of Memphis to city hall. Ah, and we were intent on taking everybody into the mayor's office, this would've been about 12, 1300 people. Ah, the decision was made to meet in the auditorium, which was just adjacent to city hall. Ah, the mayor, ah, still thinking that this was a situation pretty traditional in the South, where he would go in, express his views to the men, and the issue would be resolved right away. I can, I can re- recall him saying, at the outset of his presentation, that, ah, "You men have known me for a long time, and, ah, my door has always been open to you, and you, you know I would always give you the shirt off my back," and this, this, this kind of traditional paternalism that exists in the South. And, I think somebody from the back of the room sort of raised up and said, "We really don't want the shirt off your back. What we'd like to have is a decent wage and we'll buy our own shirt." Ah, I mean, the discussion was, was at least framed at that point.

QUESTION 8

PAUL STECKLER: Was it a mistake for the mayor to come and see them?
WILLIAM LUCY: Ah, I think it, it was useful for the mayor and I think it was useful for him. Ah, I think he completely misunderstood, ah, what was taking place. And I think the men needed to understand his view of them. Ah, he thought that, as traditionally happens in the South, you bring the boss in, and the boss would state the issue and, and frame the debate and provide the solution. And then everybody go back to work and he'll take care of it. Ah, the leaders of the union at that time, ah, T.O. Jones and the rest of them, were quite clear that they had reached a point where a discussion would not resolve the issue. The mayor made the incredible mistake of stepping right into the middle of a very difficult, ah, ah, situation, that he couldn't resolve. Ah, those of us from the union, ah, if you know anything at all about workers, and you can read their minds, you know right away that an employer in the midst of an emergent strike is not going to settle it with, with kind words. After the mayor spoke, ah, there were some of us who had an opportunity to explain, ah, the situation in, in much more detail, ah, both in an effort to make sure the workers clearly understood what was taking place. Ah, and that, ah, you know, they had a right to, to, to confront an employer in the way that they were.

QUESTION 9

PAUL STECKLER: How did the mayor react to the booing and the reaction to him?
WILLIAM LUCY: He was quite taken aback. I mean, there was, nothing like this has ever happened to him before, ah, these were men, who he felt had a, a, a major level of respect for him. And, you know, what's, what's taking place here? Ah, and I think he got quite, quite perturbed and sort of left. Ah, I think for the men, the, the fact that they stood up to the, the mayor was a new experience. Ah, this was not a strike at the outset that involved money, ah, didn't involve anything other than the recognition of the men and their problem. And the recognition of the union as a spokesman for them.

QUESTION 10

PAUL STECKLER: So early on in the strike, can you give me some examples of, of how the negotiations went and why they weren't working?
WILLIAM LUCY: Well, the, the mayor, you know, early in the strike, took the position that the strike was an illegal strike. Ah, and you know, that Memphis, Tennessee was not New York, and the union would not impose a settlement on the city. That, in fact, so long as it was illegal, he would have no discussion with the, ah, with the men or representative of the men. And this position sort of struck, struck everybody as kind of, kind of strange, because whether there was a strike or wasn't a strike wasn't the issue. The issue was that there was a problem that needed addressing. As we tried to explain to the mayor, you know, one of the key functions of a city and its administration is to provide services. And so, if services are interrupted, whatever is necessary to do to restore those services is what his attention ought to be addressed to. Well, the community, sort of at least saw the view that if there are no discussions, there can be no settlement. There was a wonderful, ah, religious leader, Monsignor Leppert, ah, you know negotiated this strange meeting where, ah, we would in effect meet in the basement of his church, he would provide all the facilities and we would speak to the mayor and hopefully the mayor would speak to us. Ah, only that the first of these attempts, ah, it was a long rectangular table with the city and its administration on one side, the union and the men on the other side, and Monsignor Leppert sitting on the end. Well, we would speak to the city, and they would not move. Monsignor Leppert would have to interpret what we said to the city, and then the city would speak back to Monsignor Leppert and ask him to tell us what he'd said--well, this is the strangest and the silliest situation you ever saw. Ah, at the same time a good deal of this was for public consumption. When the mayor would speak, the television lights would go on, and he'd be recorded for posterity. And then when Monsignor Leppert would speak, the lights would go out. I mean it was, it was the strangest environment, and that was his way, in his own mind, of not violating the law. Ah, he could forever say he has not spoke with the union or the men, and certainly has not negotiated with them.

QUESTION 11

PAUL STECKLER: What about the council meeting around the 22nd, when Davis shared, or, what did you guys do?
WILLIAM LUCY: Well, the council meeting, ah, that, that followed, ah, what we thought was a really a very successful beginning of the resolution of this strike, for the meeting of the, um, committee on public works, chaired by Mr. Fred Davis. Ah, that committee had in effect adopted a resolution that was, would have ended the strike, ah, had it been adopted by the full committee and supported by the mayor. Well, at the conclusion of the subcommittee meeting that night, prior to the full council meeting, ah, we thought everything would be over the next day. We went to the city council meeting, ah, the union--

QUESTION 12

PAUL STECKLER: Let's go back to the subcommittee meeting. What did you all do for it?
WILLIAM LUCY: The, ah, the, we, we, we came to the conclusion that the subcommittee, the ah, committee on public works, ah, really could play a role in bringing this thing to a head. Ah, the committee was chaired by a council-member, Fred Davis, ah, and his committee granted us a meeting, ah, where we wanted to discuss their possibly passing a resolution which could be adopted by the full city council, ah, that would, would frame the issue and recommend a course of, of, of solution. I don't think the committee really realized how serious we were about finding a settlement. Ah, on the day that we met, ah, they were hesitant and weren't clear about their responsibility. Ah, they felt they might be, be intruding on the mayor's jurisdiction. Ah, we had brought that day about 1300 to 1500 people to the city council chambers and we were prepared to stay forever, until we got some action from them, and ah, ah, they, ah, sort of overreacted to a degree, and ordered us out of the place, and we refused to leave. As a matter of fact, we sent out and got, ah, bread, and bologna and cold cuts and, ah, we just really decided to camp in for, for a good while. Ah, the committee really under some real pressure, you know call the police who didn't quite know what to do at that point either. And finally somewhere near, you know, the 11th hour, they passed a resolution that could've been passed at the beginning of the meeting. And, ah, it provided a framework for the solution. And I guess the interesting thing is that the, this was a brand new city hall chambers. I mean, the, the city was so proud of it, it had, you know, bright red rugs, and drapes, you know, tables. The men, who also saw that as their city hall, I mean, completely cleaned the place up, you know, it was spotless when we left. And that led into the following day the full meeting of the, ah, of the, of the Memphis city council. Ah, where we had been promised, ah, a hearing on the committee's recommendation. Ah, and since they, the members of the committee were substantial leaders of the council, a pretty strong, ah, you know, indication that it would be adopted by the council as a whole. And that would be sort of a sense of the legislative body. And the mayor would buy this and we would move on forward and resolve this thing. Well, again, we came down both with the, we being the union, came down with the, the workers, ah, and across the city the word had went out that this strike was going to come to a head, so we had a number of community leaders, religious leaders who came also to the council that morning for the purpose of lending their support to this final solution. Well, when the council meeting opened, ah, it opened in the traditional, you know, formal way, ah, and at that point, ah, the, the chairperson of the council turned to, ah, some other member, I forget who, and they, they just made this silly statement, ah, and moved to adjourn. Ah, and we, we, I mean we were all caught in this strange situation, "Well, what happened to the recommendation that was going to come from the committee on public works?" And they simply adjourned and got up to leave. Well, I mean there was absolute, you know, chaos, ah, at that point because, the, ah, the men felt that they had been double-crossed, the union felt that they had been sort of been giving short-shrift. Ah, and we were quite concerned as to where the, the whole thing was going to go from there. When we came out of the city council chambers, ah, there was such confusion that we really thought that we had to provide some sort of a cooling off process, ah, to allow the frustrations of the men to sort of, you know, tone themselves down. When we came out, we confronted a substantial portion of the Memphis police force that had obviously been called, ah, to the spot after we went into the city council chambers. So we came out to meet this, this horde of police standing out front, and in effect, ah, lining the plaza, ah, in front of city hall. Ah, our president, President Wurf, ah, went to who appeared to be in charge of the police force, and while we were still frustrated about what had happened in the, ah, in the council chambers, we wanted at least the authority to march to some place where we could address the men. Ah, and this was, I guess the second major march of the, of the strike. Ah, we finally reached agreement that we could march down Main Street, using a portion of the street so that, ah, you know, we wouldn't interrupt and disrupt traffic. Ah, they agreed to this, ah, we began the march. Some of us who had some other responsibilities took off to a, to take care of those. But the police allowed the march to get, to get stretched out along the street for two, maybe two and a half blocks, and then began to, ah, to really crowd the march using police vehicles, over towards the curb. And in the course of doing this, obviously making it smaller and smaller in terms of the width. And it depends on who you talk to as to what actually happened at what point in time, but it, but at a point in time the police began to mace, began to you know, really beat, began to really brutalize the marchers. And everyone who was with them, ah, every- you know, people who were on the sidewalks not even involved in the march itself.

QUESTION 13

PAUL STECKLER: Now, you were laughing telling me, when I said "Was this a turning point?" because the ministers there and the way they were dressed and the reaction, can you tell me was this a turning point, and why were the ministers?
WILLIAM LUCY: This was a clear turning point in the strike. Ah, the ministers who had came to city council to, ah, to lend their moral and personal support to the solution, ah, thought that the men had got, you know, bad treatment before the city council. But they, they did not, I'm sure, think that, ah, that it could not be repaired. Ah, when the violence broke out from the police force, the ministers were part of the march. Ah, and they certainly didn't believe that, in any stretch of the imagination, that they would be treated the same as ordinary blue collar workers in the city of Memphis, Tennessee. Ah, and the, the, the dividing line or the polarizing line at that day, if you were Black and on the street, in Memphis, Tennessee, in that area, you were treated that way, and no matter what your station in life was. And I think this was a turning point in the strike for at least one of the prominent, you know, re- religious leaders, Ralph Jackson. Ah, Jackson who was a conservative, ah, leader in the religious community, ah, but was maced right along with everyone else. Ah, just completely had a revelation as to who he was and what he was in the city of Memphis. And I'm sure there were others who experienced the same instant realization that they may be economically better off, they may have a greater stature in life, but before the eyes of the political leadership in the city administration they were still Black.

QUESTION 14

PAUL STECKLER: You were telling me specifically you that got all these ministers in their Sunday best suits?
WILLIAM LUCY: The, they were dressed, ah, to appear before the city council of Memphis, Tennessee, and this is a rather important event for them. And, they, ah, they came down in their, in their finest. Ah, ah, the, the, the, I guess the intellectual leadership and the religious leadership of most Southern cities is a very formal group of people, and they react very formally, and, and as I say, they had their, their, their Sunday best, ah, and the macing was the ultimate outrage and insult to them.

QUESTION 15

PAUL STECKLER: Tell me about inviting King in March, why, what it had to do with morale?
WILLIAM LUCY: Ah, in March when the decision began to, at least the, ah, issue began to be discussed about inviting Dr. King to come to Memphis, it, it grew out of the frustrations of, of the city and I guess maybe the, the, the media really putting a lid on, ah, what was taking place in Memphis. Ah, we were 47 days into the strike and, ah, nobody knew it except us and the city of Memphis. Um, Roy Wilkins had come to town, ah, Bayard Rustin had come to town to speak in support of the strike, but it still, there was no understanding beyond the city as to what was taking place. Ah, the invitation to Dr. King to come was that, we believed that he would, ah, not only, you know, lend his moral support to the strike, but he was in the midst of organizing the Poor People's Campaign and we just really thought that that would be a good, ah, ah, movement for him to identify with, that there would be national media with him that would, ah, in effect take an interest in what was taking place.

QUESTION 16

PAUL STECKLER: Was there a toll being taken on the older workers as well?
WILLIAM LUCY: We think so. We think that the, uh--
PAUL STECKLER:
WILLIAM LUCY: Ah, there was a toll being taken on the workers because, ah, and the other thing, the issues were so simple, yet the city was making them so difficult. Ah, and we, we and they believed that a, a moral shot in the arm was, was, would be useful, ah, and that Dr. King was the one who had the kind of stature that could bring that, that, that, that moral support as well as inspiration to continue.

QUESTION 17

PAUL STECKLER: What was Reverend Lawson's role?
WILLIAM LUCY: Reverend Lawson was co-chair, along with H. Ralph Jackson of the committee that was basically the community support committee, it was called the Committee on the Move for Equality. Ah, and it was a, a, a, a structure for the religious community, the political leadership in the Black community, ah, all those who wanted to lend their support to the strike at that time.

QUESTION 18

PAUL STECKLER: What about when King first, first came? What was that first, are we running out?

QUESTION 19

PAUL STECKLER: Describe Lawson for me.
WILLIAM LUCY: Jim Lawson, ah, was really one of the strong, bright, intelligent leaders of our time, not just that time. Ah, he's a, a, a very deep thinker, one who had a long standing relationship with the, ah, Civil Rights Movement, and a personal relationship with Dr. King. Ah, and had, ah, was pastoring Centenary, ah, Methodist Church in Memphis at that time, but well respected across the community.

QUESTION 20

PAUL STECKLER: Was he a powerful leader?
WILLIAM LUCY: He was a powerful leader in the Black community. He was a hated leader in the, in the broad White community. Ah, simply because he was a different kind of religious leader than the White power structure was accustomed to dealing with, ah, in Memphis.

QUESTION 21

PAUL STECKLER: Why? What was different about him?
WILLIAM LUCY: Ah, his vision of what was necessary to adjust the grievances of, of people now, ah, while they were strong with regard to his religious, ah, and theologic responsibilities, he was also very militant in terms of what the community ought to be doing, ah, for people right now.

QUESTION 22

PAUL STECKLER: King's first speech at the Mason Temple, March 18th, what stands out to you, what was most vivid about what you remember that night?
WILLIAM LUCY: I think, what I remember from that night of that first speech was the incredible ability that King had to understand and interpret the, ah, the issues and what was taking place. Ah, he had not been there before, and he had had the most minimal of briefings. But he clearly understood that the, the struggle was really about a new kind of people, people who worked 40 hours a week and still lived in poverty, and he was able to, to, ah, arrange his presentation to demonstrate to the crowd that he understood this, ah, and to give them a sense that, ah, that their struggle was a legitimate struggle, and that they had every right to carry out.

QUESTION 23

PAUL STECKLER: How did he speak that night? Can you remember, how was the crowd reaction?
WILLIAM LUCY: Well, the crowd completely reacted as, as, as, as only a crowd could react to Dr. King. I mean, his, his oratory skills were incredible, but again, his ability to interpret this and to put it into words that were so basic and so simple that everybody could understand, and he brought the, ah, the audience to just a fever pitch. I mean, ah, and I think in the course of that speech recognized that, that this was a new movement, ah, in America and a new movement among working people, a new movement among poor people, and one that had to be supported.

QUESTION 24

PAUL STECKLER: Do you remember him specifically talking about how he felt that Memphis was, what Memphis was like as a community?
WILLIAM LUCY: Well, he thought that Mem- Memphis was in effect symbolic of, of, of the country as a whole. Where the powers to be really had not come to deal with the, ah, the issues that affected the ordinary people. Ah, and that the, ah, struggle of working people to earn a decent living, ah, was what the whole problem in America was about.

QUESTION 25

PAUL STECKLER: I want you to think back for a second, and sort of go into the recesses of your memory, the march that he leads. What do you remember about that march, you specifically?
WILLIAM LUCY: I, I from the, I, I remember from the march the, the, the organization of the beginning of it, first of all. Ah, and how the, almost the entire city thought that this would be the, ah, the catalyst that would, would bring a solution together, because you had all of the forces that was necessary. Ah, King's prestige, his willingness to, ah, to put himself in, in the middle of this activity, and a growing sense across the community that this thing had gone on just too long. Ah, as the march progressed, we began to understand that there were some other, other things at play also. Ah, as we learned later on, the police department as well as bureaus of the federal government, ah, had really became involved, in a rather destructive way. Ah, the violence that emerged from the march, was not of the strikers' doing, but rather, in our opinion, the, the activities of, of provocateurs and, that were, that were really active among certain groups in the community.

QUESTION 26

PAUL STECKLER: As you were marching, when did you first sense that something was wrong? What did you see? What did you feel?
WILLIAM LUCY: Ah, while we were marching, I was about in the first one-third of the march as I could tell at that point. Ah, and we began to hear, ah, windows breaking, ah, we began to hear, you know, loud rustling and uneasiness among the marchers. Ah, and there hadn't, been no violence in whatsoever in the march, and certainly none encouraged by the union. But we couldn't quite figure out what was taking place. And then we began to see individuals who were stepping out of the march, ah, and, and, and, ah, throwing things at windows[1] Eyes on the Prize II: America at the Racial Crossroads 1965 - 1985; Episode 204-23, and ah, we began to really be very concerned about what all of this meant. Ah, and some of us were staff people, and some of the leadership among the strikers, those that we could lay hands on where we were, began to grab a hold of these people and pull them back into the march to, to, to sort of bring this to a halt. Ah, after a while, the police themselves, this apparently, not necessarily on the cue, but certainly at, on command, ah, began to wade into the crowd and began to, to beat people, they began to, you know, really truss people up a bit, and we were quite concerned because the march was filled with all kinds of people who had come to participate.

QUESTION 27

PAUL STECKLER: You're being diplomatic right now. If I was in the middle of that, I might have been pretty scared, I mean--
WILLIAM LUCY: Well, I, I wasn't so, I wasn't scared, I wasn't fearful at that point. Ah, what I was more concerned about is the implications that this had for the resolution of the strike. Ah, the implications that it had, while I didn't think very deeply about it, for Dr. King. Ah, and, and the police, we had, we had a police riot. Ah, not brought on by a confrontation between the marchers and the police, but brought on by the police, instant reaction for the protection of property.

QUESTION 28

PAUL STECKLER: What happened as, as you retreated back on to Beale St., were you doing anything in particular you can remember?
WILLIAM LUCY: Well, the, the first thing we were concerned about, as we, as we brought the march to a halt, was the, ah, ah, the safety of Dr. King. Ah, and at the front of the march, ah, that was taken care of, and then some of the staff people came, concerned about some of the elderly people who were in the crowd, and how, ah, they needed to be looked after, and the police at this point again was in, indiscriminately, ah, beating people. Ah, we decided to move back to, ah, to, ah, Clayborn Temple, ah, so that we could really just sort of get ourselves together. Ah, and the staff people were just simply trying to care of everybody that we could to make sure that nobody was seriously injured either by the stampede of the crowd, or by the police and their activities.

QUESTION 29

PAUL STECKLER: Very briefly, who were the Invaders?
WILLIAM LUCY: The, the Invaders were a brunch, ah, a group----
PAUL STECKLER: Start again, without--Who were the Invaders?
WILLIAM LUCY: The Invaders were a group of, um, you know, college students from Memphis State who, ah, had a very, very strong feeling about the need for a more militant approach, not just to the problems of the city of Memphis, but certainly to the problems of the strike. Ah, made up of, of, ah, student leaders, ah, and I think very intelligent and very bright kids, ah, ah, they were later infiltrated by the Memphis police department, and I suspect by the Federal Bureau of Investigation also.

QUESTION 30

PAUL STECKLER: Now you had a very different description of when we were in Memphis--
WILLIAM LUCY: You got me on film, I guess.

QUESTION 31

PAUL STECKLER: OK, we're driving to the airport, and you're with King. Tell me about driving with him and what he was saying, your thoughts about if he was going to come back and why?
WILLIAM LUCY: As we drove Dr. King to the, ah, airport, ah, we, we discussed a number of things, first of all his perception of, of the strike. Ah, and his, his classic description that this, that this is the confrontation of the, ah, of the '60s and the '70s, the, the working poor in an effort to improve their own situation. Ah, I believe he was committed to coming back, because, because the question of whether or not he could have a non-violent demonstration, ah, again, was, was, was very, you know, critical to him. Ah, there was a more militant mood moving across the country, and Dr. King's non-violent leadership, ah, was being called under question, and the violence at this demonstration was being charged directly to him. And he felt that he had to set that record straight.

QUESTION 32

PAUL STECKLER: What was his mood as he got out of the car?
WILLIAM LUCY: Ah, his, his mood when he, when he left us, was, was, was, ah, upbeat but, but pensive, uh. He, he could not understand why this had taken place. Ah, in all of the situations that his moral authority was sufficient to have a peaceful, ah, demonstration and have a peaceful confrontation with the authorities.

QUESTION 33

PAUL STECKLER: Early on in the strike there were lots of marches, what was happening day to day?
WILLIAM LUCY: Day to day during the course of the strike we, we, we had to do two things. We had to keep the workers informed, ah, and we had to have a role for them to play, both ensuring the city that they were determined to carry on the strike, and at the same time, ah, demonstrate to the community that they were still alive and well.

QUESTION 34

PAUL STECKLER: So on a daily basis, what were they doing?
WILLIAM LUCY: On a daily basis we were marching downtown, we were marching to city hall, we were disrupting the, the commercial activities in the business section, business district of, ah, downtown Memphis.

QUESTION 35

PAUL STECKLER: Do you remember people singing, or what sorts of things they sang?
WILLIAM LUCY: Ah, we sang every day. Ah, we, we sang the traditional freedom song, "We Shall Not Be Moved", ah, we, we, we, we modified those songs to point out the, the villains of the community, Mayor Loeb, other members of the council who had taken a much more reactionary stand than, ah, we thought they, they should have.
PAUL STECKLER: Do you remember those--

QUESTION 36

PAUL STECKLER: Do you remember what people were chanting back then?
WILLIAM LUCY: Well, we were chanting and modifying new and old civil rights songs, like, and I remember one distinctly that was aimed at the, at Mayor Loeb and it paraphrased one of the old spirituals, it was, you know, "Loeb is our leader, he shall be removed." Ah, the young kids, ah, who had just an incredible, you know, ability to, to develop songs with the spirit of most of the marchers.

QUESTION 37

PAUL STECKLER: So what was happening, you know, day by day in the marches.
WILLIAM LUCY: Every day in the mar- every day during the course of the strike, we had a march, ah, a march downtown or a march to city hall, ah, where we sang, we chanted, and some of the old songs that we, were, ah, I remember distinctly was aimed at the mayor and aimed at the city administration. And I, I, I remember, ah, one of the modifications that we used was, ah, ""Henry Loeb is our leader, he shall be removed." Ah, and that, that was prophetic we thought in terms of sending a message to the community as a whole.

QUESTION 38

PAUL STECKLER: That's good. Mountaintop speech. What do you most remember during that speech and what was going on that night?
WILLIAM LUCY: The, the mountaintop speech, ah, took place on an evening, I guess that you could say was perfect for the kind of speech that it was. It was, ah, an inspiring speech, one that Dr. King, ah, had really given what appeared to be a good deal of thought to. Ah, it told about his personal experiences, both high points and low points. Ah, it wove into it a message that the strikers were entitled to continue their struggle, and certainly entitled to a broad base of support, ah, that they had built across the city. Ah, he then, you know, went on to, to, to talk about the vision, ah, that he saw both for them and for himself. Ah, and it was one of the most dramatic speeches I've ever heard. And there was not, ah, down, it was not negative, it was really very, very high. Ah, when it ended, ah, I mean, the, the, the entire church at Mason Temple just went, went wild with excitement. I mean he had touched a chord, ah, that was, that was so deeply rooted in all of the people, ah, it went far beyond the strikers, ah, ah, to community people, and he had shared with them his, his view of not only himself but his role in, ah, in society.

QUESTION 39

PAUL STECKLER: OK, I want you to think back to that moment. He's finished the speech, he turns around and you see his face, and the crowd reacts. What do you see? What's the crowd doing?
WILLIAM LUCY: Ah, the, the, the crowd is, is, is leaping to their feet, they're yelling, they're, they're, they're excited about, ah, his interpretation of, of himself, ah, his future role both in the, ah, movement as well as in the Black experience. Uh--

QUESTION 40

PAUL STECKLER: Did the crowd go wild?
WILLIAM LUCY: The crowd, the crowd went absolutely wild. Ah, and it's, it's just really hard to describe the kind of enthusiasm that was, ah, and the kind of emotion that he had pulled out of people. Ah, this strike is, is 50 days old, ah, or 55 days old, and, and it is, it's taken its toll on everyone and you're looking for that inspiration, and, and he certainly brought it.

QUESTION 41

PAUL STECKLER: Was he sad at all?
WILLIAM LUCY: Not at all, not at all. Dr. King was, was very upbeat, was very emotional, uh. His, his, his, his comment about having been to the mountaintop and looked over and seen the promised land was not a, a downer, it was not a negative thought. It was one that, ah, says that the struggle is continuing and I, I, I, I am a part of it and we, we will all, ah, ah, we will overcome. It was a high point, not a low point.

QUESTION 42

PAUL STECKLER: And how did you feel at that moment?
WILLIAM LUCY: I, I, I personally felt very good. Ah, I was always confident that we would win the strike. It was never a question of losing, and that reinforced it, because it gave the, the men, it gave the union, it sent a signal to across the city, that this moral struggle is going to continue until victory.

QUESTION 43

PAUL STECKLER: What I want you try to do in one statement, a few sentences, when I ask you what did you see when he finished, combine just what you saw of the crowd vividly and what you saw with King and how he felt, and how it made you feel about the strike. So the mountaintop speech ends and you've built up to this fever pitch, he turns around, you see him, and see the crowd. How did it, how did it, how did it all--
WILLIAM LUCY: Well, I mean, his, the look on his face and the emotion that was being displayed by the crowd, ah, said to me that, we, victory is very near in this, in this strike. Ah, that, ah, the people are united, ah, he has made a moral commitment to it, and it's simply a matter of persevering.
PAUL STECKLER: OK, lets stop down for a second.

QUESTION 44

PAUL STECKLER: OK, you're at the temple, and the crowd is expectant. And in walks Dr. Abernathy. What happened?
WILLIAM LUCY: Well, we had, the, the, the, we in the union and the, ah, those who had gathered expected Dr. King that night. But bear in mind that that was a, a dreadful night. I mean it was just a terrible night in terms of the weather. And the expectation was that the crowd would not be very large. Ah, Dr. Abernathy came over, ah, to deliver, ah, the, the main address. And that, there was such enthusiasm that, in effect, it almost demanded that Dr. King come over and speak. And, ah, Ralph then sent word back that, the Doc had to come over.

QUESTION 45

PAUL STECKLER: What about that last day? You didn't see King, what were you doing during the day?
WILLIAM LUCY: The, ah, the city d- d- during, that, that, that last day, the city had gone to court, ah, to get an injunction to prevent the march from taking place. Ah, and so we were dealing with all of the logistics, ah, that surrounded the march, ah, attempting to present our case to, ah, to the courts, ah, trying to get people prepared to play different roles in the march. Ah, marshalls, ah, trying to make sure that the strikers and the signs and the staging, everything that we thought had to be done logistically to support the march. Ah, both we and the, ah, committee on the move, on the move for equality was deep, deeply involved in.

QUESTION 46

PAUL STECKLER: So what were you specifically doing during that day?
WILLIAM LUCY: My job was, was staff, ah, mobilization and staff support. Ah, and the continued preparation of the leadership of the union, the rank and file leadership, so that they understood their role.

QUESTION 47

PAUL STECKLER: So you were getting in contact with people?
WILLIAM LUCY: Yes, touching base with people, ah, all over the city, ah, because, you know, we would mobilize at lunch time, but the march was going to begin earlier than that, so we wanted to make sure that everybody was in place. Ah, it, it was a, it was a busy period for the staff of the union.

QUESTION 48

PAUL STECKLER: Tell me what you were doing the next day?
WILLIAM LUCY: The next day we were busily preparing for the march that was going to take place. There were, there were a number of, ah, I guess, mechanical and logistical things that we had to get in place. Ah, and we were busy going about the business of dealing with the injunction and organizing for the march itself.

QUESTION 49

PAUL STECKLER: The speech is over, he turns around, how did the crowd react, how did King look and how did it make you feel?
WILLIAM LUCY: When, when Dr. King concluded the speech, ah, and simply turned on, on, at the pulpit, I mean, the, the crowd actually went wild. I mean, there was just such emotion being displayed. Ah, he, he was, was satisfied himself that he had delivered what was the speech necessary for that, that moment. Ah, myself and I'm sure the rest of us who had responsibility for the strike really generally felt that this was a, a critical point in the struggle. That, that he had brought the kind of message that was necessary to, to re-energize the whole movement. Ah, I had never had any doubts, be- before, but certainly at that point that we would be victorious in the strike.

QUESTION 50

PAUL STECKLER: Let's go back to Lawson. When you first met Lawson, I mean, how did Lawson strike you, what was he like? What was Reverend Lawson like?
WILLIAM LUCY: Ah, Reverend Jim Lawson was a, was a very, you know, interesting individual. Ah, he was not quick to join the side of the union, although he was very quick to join the side of the men. Ah, he was a very deep, ah, intellectual, you know, ah, person, ah, one who had a great history in the Civil Rights Movement. As a matter of fact, he had been an advisor to Dr. King many years before. But also had studied directly, ah, in Egypt, ah, or rather in India, ah, with, ah, with Mr. Ghandi. I mean, he was a, he was a disciple of the non-violent movement, but extremely miligent[SIC], extremely intelligent and extremely committed.

QUESTION 51

PAUL STECKLER: Was it his personal invitation that brought King to Memphis?
WILLIAM LUCY: Yes. Jim personally invited Dr. King to join the struggle, because he, ah, understood the relationship of the struggle of these workers with the overall mobilization of the Poor People's Campaign that Dr. King was involved in. And the, the, the merging of our need to have Dr. King's moral presence and what he thought would be Dr. King's understanding of the struggle, ah, was what motivated him to, to reach out.