Title: Jonathan and Gilbert, men of color v. Coleman Duncan, Edward Tract, and Charles Wahrendorff Plaintiff: JonathanGilbert Defendant: Duncan, ColemanTracy, EdwardWahrendorff, Charles Date Filed: March 12, 1831March Term Term: Cause of Action: Suit for Freedom Case Number: 304 Court: St. Louis Circuit Court in Chancery Publication Info: St. Louis, Missouri: Washington University in St. Louis, University Libraries
2011 Source: The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection. Availability: Documents are in the public domain
MissouriState ofMissouriMissouriCircuit CourtCircuit Court Third Judicial Circuit St LouisCountyMarch Term AD
1831To the Honorable
WilliamWilliam C CarrCarr Judge of said Court in
Chancery
Sitting
Your orators Jonathan
& Gilbert men of color
represent unto your honor that heretofore to
wit
on the 20th day of May in the year of our Lord
eighteen hundred & thirtyat said
county Coleman DuncanColeman
Duncan whom your complainants pray may be
made defendant to this bill had seized & taken
into his possession & thereheld in
his custody the said GilbertGilbert who is the brother of said JonathanJonathan
& the said ColemanColeman then &
there claimed siad GilbertGilbert as his slave for life offered to sell
him as such to said complainant JonathanJonathan who
is a free man of color &
threatened that if saidJonathanJonathan
would not purchase said GilbertGilbert to take
said GilbertGilbert to some other place & sell him as a
slave The said ColemanColeman proposed that said JonathanJonathan
should give him in advance one hundred Dollars & said
JonathanJonathan & said GilbertGilbert
should give him there obligation
for three hundred Dollars more payable by Installments $100 payable Ten
months from the date last aforesaid and & $100
payable Twenty months from the date last aforesaid &
$100 payable Thirty months from the said 25th
day May AD 1830 and it was further suggested that by the time these installments became
due said GilbertGilbertcould earn the money aforesaid $400 by his laboring
& it was preposed that if saidGilbertGilbert should die at any
time before the end of the Thirty months aforesaid that the said
Jonathan & Gilbert
should only pay said a
porportionable part of said sum of Three hundred Dollas, and itwas
suggested that as GilbertGilbert desired to be a free man said ColemanColeman
should convey said GilbertGilbert to said JonathanJonathan
as a slave by bill of Sale That said JonathanJonathan
should give said GilbertGilbert a bond of Emancipation and that said complaints should give them
same obligation to said ColemanColeman for the Three hundred
Dollars payable by Installments as aforesaid your complainants say that
said JonathanJonathan acting under the belief
that the representation made by said ColemanColeman that saidGilbertGilbert was his slave was true & said GilbertGilbertacting under of false imprisonment they
to the preparation
& acted upon the suggestions of said
ColemanColeman and saidJonathanJonathan
accordingly advanced $100 to him said ColemanColeman then gave said JonathanJonathan a
bill
of sale
for saidGilbertGilbert, said JonathanJonathan there signed &
sealed in presence of witnesses a bond of Emancipation
for said GilbertGilbert which
bond
of Emancipation it
was suggested said JonathanJonathan should keep the
said sum of $400 should be paid by said GilbertGilbert so that said
JonathanJonathan should be secured for the many
& which he should
security for an amount of
said GilbertGilbert which Bill of Sale andbond of
Emancipation are the first marked A No 1 & the
Second B No
2. and the complainants make them a part of
this bill. said complainants say they
their expected & believed
to said ColemanColeman there same obligation of for
three hundred Dollars payable by Instalments according to the
proposition of said ColemanColeman as before stated and
said complainants say that said sum of
$100 was advanced & said bond for $300 was given for the
purpose of affecting the the
Emancipation of said GilbertGilbert from Slavery
& no other consideration and said complainants alledge that
when saidBond was
expected
& long before that said GilbertGilbert
had became entitled to his freedom &
said ColemanColeman well knew
it but then & for a Long time
held
saidGilbertGilbert in slavery & false
imprisonment said complainants further say
that said Bond for
$300 as they are informed &
believe is now held by Edward TracyEdwardEdward TracyTracy&
Charles WahrendorffCharlesCharles WahrendorffWahrendorff of St LouisSt Louis
& that they are interested in it.
Said complainants further alledge that saidColeman DuncanColeman Duncan is
not a resident of the state ofMissouriMissouri & that
he is insolent & that if said
bond should
be paid your complainants could have no
adequate remedy
against him, your complainants pray that said & may alsobe made
defendants your complainants for the
reasonsaforesaid
pray that a subpoena may issued
requiring the Defendants to appear and answer this bill that they may be
compelled to answer an all the allegations of this
bill so
far as such answers will not them, that
they may be
compelled to produce in court the
said bond
for $300 - that they may be at Law on said
bond
untill they shall have
answered this bill to and finally that by the
of this Court said bond may
be delivered &
cancelled and finally the complainants pray
for such further & other relief
as shall tothis Honorable court
& they will pray
G A BirdG A Bird Solicitor for complainants
No304Circuit CourtSt Louis Circuit CourtMarch Term
1831Jonathan & Gilbert freemen of color
vsColeman DuncanColeman DuncanEdward TracyEdward
Tracy & Charles WahrendorffCharles
Wahrendorff
Original bill in
ChangeryThe clerk of St LouisSt Louis
Circuit will pleaseIssue a subpoenaG A BirdG
A Bird Solicitor forcomplts
Filed12th March 1831Archibald GambleArchibald Gamble
ClerkCopy of B
Know all
men
by these presents that I JonathanJonathan a free black
man of St LouisSt LouisMissouriMissouri for & in consideration
of good causes
mehereunto moving do hereby
emancipate discharge & free from slavery a
certain Negro Man aged about Twenty five
years named GilbertGilbert being the same
person this day conveyed to mt by Coleman DuncanColemanColeman DuncanDuncan by
bill of Sale_ hereby relinquishing all my
to him & discharging himfrom all
claim
or
of I have hereto set my hand & seal this Twenty
fifth day ofMay in the year of our Lord one
thousand eight hundred & thirty
Jonathan DuncanJonathan
Duncanx his mark
Signed Sealed &
Delivered after having been read to
JonathanJonathan in our
presenceJ SpaldingJJ SpaldingSpaldingJamesJames
KeyteMissouriState ofMissouriMissouri. Judicial Circuit
St Louis CountyMarch Term AD
1831To the Honorable WilliamWilliam C. CarrCarr
Judge of said Court in Cancery
Sitting
Your orators Jonathan
& Gilbert men of colorrepresent unto your
honor that heretofore to wit on the25th day of may in the year of our Lord
eightheen hundred & thirty at said county Coleman DuncanColeman Duncan whom your
complainants pray may be made Defendant to
this
bill had seized
& taken into his possession &
then held in his custody the said
GilbertGilbert
who is the brother of said JonathanJonathan
and the said then there saidCoelman then &
there claimed saidGilbertGilbert as his slave
for life offered to sell him as such to
said JonathanJonathan who is a free man ofcolor
and threatened that if said JonathanJonathan not
purchase said GilbertGilbert to take said GilbertGilbert
to some other place
& sell him as a slave That
said ColemanColeman preposed that said JonathanJonathan
should give
him one hundred Dollars and said JonathanJonathan
& said GilbertGilbert should give
him this same
obligation for three hundred Dollars made
payable payable by $100 payableten months
from the date last aforesaid $100
payable twenty months
from the date last aforesaid &
$100 payable in thirty monthsfrom
thedate last
aforesaid said 25th day
of of may AD 1830 - and it was
further suggested
that by the time these installments became
due said GilbertGilbert could earn the money aforesaid $400
by his labor and it was proposed that
if said
GilbertGilbert should die at any time before
the end of the Thrity months aforesaid
that the said Jonathan
& Gilbert should only pay said
Cole
man a proportionable part of said sum ofThree
hundred Dollars - and it was
Suggested that as Said GilbertGilbert desired tobecome a free
man Said ColemanColeman shouldconvey
said GilbertGilbert to said JonathanJonathan as a slave by
bill
of sale
that said JonathanJonathan shouldgive
said GilbertGilbert a
Deed of Emancipation andthat
said complainants should give these same
obligations to said ColemanColeman for the Three hundred Dollars
payble by intallments as aforesaid Your
complainants say that the said JonathanJonathan actingunder the
belief that the representation made
by said ColemanColeman that said GilbertGilbert was his slave was
true and the said GilbertGilbert acting under duress of false
imprisonment they agreed to thepropositions &
acted upon the suggestions of saidColemanColeman
and said JonathanJonathan
accordingly- advanced one hundred Dollars
to him saidColemanColemansaid JonathanJonathanthen gave saidJonathanJonathan a
bill of sale for said GilbertGilbert Said JonathanJonathan then Signed
& Sealed in presence of
witnesses a Deed of
emancipation for said GilbertGilbert which of emancipation it
wassuggested said JonathanJonathan should untill the said sum of
$400 should be paid by said GilbertGilbert so
that said JonathanJonathan should be secured for the money
advanced & which he should
security for on
account of saidgilbert which Bill of Sale & Deed of
emancipation the first marked A No 1 and thesecond B No 2 and the
complainants make them a part of this Bill.
Said Complainants say they there executed &
delivered to saidColemanColeman obligation for three
hundred Dollars payable by instalments
according to theproposition
of said ColemanColeman as before stated and said
Complainants say that sum
of $100 was advanced and said bond for $300
was given for the purpose of
effecting theemancipation
of said GilbertGilbert from slavery & no other
consideration and said complain -ants
alledge that when said
bond was executedand long before that said GilbertGilbert had become
entitled to his freedom but there & for a
longtime previous held said GilbertGilbert in Slavery &
falseimprisonment. Siad complainants furthersay that said
Bond for $300 is now held byEdward Lay & Charles WahrendorffCharles
Wahrendorff of St LouisStSt LouisLouis & that they are interested
in it. Said Complainants further alledge that saidColeman DuncanColeman
Duncan is not a resident of theMissouriState ofMissouriMissouri & that
he is &
that if said Bond should be paid your
complain-ants would have no adequate remedy against
him. Your complainants pray that said Lay
& may also be made Defendants Your complainants
for the reasons aforesaidpray- that a subpoena may issue
requiring the Defendants to appear & answer this
bill that they may be compelled to answer onoath all the
allegations of this bill so far assuch answer will not
criminate them that they maybe compelled to produce
in court said bond for $300 that they maybe
from proceeding at Law on said Bond untill
they shall have answered this
bill
to_ and finally that by the the
Decree of this Court said Bond may be deliveredup &
cancelled and finally the complaints pray for such futher
& other relief as shall seemmeet to
this honorable court and they will pray &c
G A BirdG A Bird SolicitorCopy
of A No
1
Know all by those
presents that I Coleman DuncanColemanColeman DuncanDuncan of Hopkins CountyHopkins County in
KentuckyKentucky for and in consideration of four
hundred Dollars tome in hand paid by Jonathan DuncanJonathan
Duncan afree black man of St LouisSt Louis in
MissouriMissouri havegranted bargained
sold and conveyed and by these presents
do grant bargain sell
and convey unto said Jonathan DuncanJonathan Duncan a certain Negro
manslave aged about Twenty five years namedGilbertGilbert
being the same slave conveyed to meJamesJames by Bill of Sale
dated second day of April in the year
of our our Lord one
thousand eight hundred & Twenty
six-to have & to hold said Negro man slave named
GilbertGilbert unto him said JonathanJonathan his
administrators
& assigns and I do hereby
that I & my
representations shall forever warrant & defend said
slave & the title thereto unto the saidJonathanJonathan
his executors
administrators andassigns against all presons
claiming him as a slave
In testimony
whereof I have hereunto setmy hand &
seal this Twently fifth day of
May in the
year of our
Lord one thousand eight hundred
& thirtyColeman DuncanColeman DuncanSigned Sealed &Delivered in presence ofJ SpaldingJ Spalding
Sitting as
Court of Chancery) at the next term
thereof to be held at the City of St LouisCityCity of St LouisofCity of St LouisSt Louis within and for
the County of Saint LouisCounty of Saint Louis on the Fourth Monday of March instant then
and there to answer to a bill of complaint exhibited against them
by JonathanJonathan and GilbertGilbert free men of Color
and have you then there this
writ.
Witness
Archibald GambleArchibaldArchibald GambleGamble Clerk of our said
Circuit CourtCircuit Court at office this twelfth day
of March Eighteen hundred and thirty oneArchibald GambleArchibaldArchibald GambleGamble Clerk
I acknowledge service for
E Tracy
No304Circuit CourtStCircuit CourtLouisCircuit CourtCircuit CourtMarch Term
1831Jonathan & GilbertvsColeman DuncanColeman Duncan, Edward TracyEdwardEdward TracyTracy & Charles WahrendorffCharles
Wahrendorff
Executed
this writ on Edward TracyEdward Tracy
by off-ering
to him the copy of bill furnished by the
Clerk, and reading this writ to
him, & on Chas.
Wahrindorff by his (said Tracy's) acknowledging
service,
for him, Coleman DuncanColeman
Duncan not found in my county
The said defendants Charles WahrendorffCharles
Wahrendorff &Edward TracyEdward Tracy,
& reserving to
themselves all and allmanner
of benefit of
exception to said Bill of Complaint
for the manifold
errors, & insufficiences
thereincontained for answer thereunto or to so
much
thereof or they are advised, is material,
answer and they say that in the spring of the
year 1830JonathanJonathan
one of thecomplainants,
came to the defendant WahrendorffWahrendorff &
stated that his (Jonathan's brother
GilbertGilbert, the slave of Coleman DuncanColeman Duncan was then is
your & could
get free by paying & saving
the sum
of four hun-dred
dollars, and asked said Wahrendorff's
advicerespecting the manner in which it should be
done: he then stated further that
said coleman
wishedhim (JonathanJonathan) to become bound
for the money in which case he would give sufficient
length of credit to enable GilbertGilbert to earn the
money & that the
sum of four houndred
dollars was re-quired to be
paid down. The defendant Wahren-dorff advised JonathanJonathan
not to become bound unless Coleman DuncanColeman Duncan would
agree to make a notable deduction from the amount
of thepurchase
money, in case
GilbertGilbert should die or become
permanently
unable to work within the period
allowed by the contract. JonathanJonathan to the suggestion of said
WahrendorffWahrendorff && asked him
to accompany
him -said JonathanJonathan to the office of
J SpaldingJ.
Spalding in order to conclude the
arrangement with Coleman DuncanColeman
Duncan. The defendants further
say
that immediately thereafter said
WahrendorffWahrendorff did accompany JonathanJonathan to
the office of said SpaldingSpalding where the
arrange-ment was was concluded: and an instrument
made seal of Jonathan&
Gilbert to Coleman DuncanColeman Duncan for three hundred dollars was executed (a copy of which marked A. No. 1. is
hereto
annexed as part of this and immediately thereafter said Cole-man &
JonathanJonathanaccompanied the defendant Wah-rendorff to his stone, where he
said defendant advanced
at Jonathan's request, one hundred dollor
to said ColemanColeman, it being the sum that was
by the agreement to be paid down in cash and that in all this transaction
the defendant WahrendorffWahrendorff was in no no win interest-ed, but acted merely as the friend of
JonathanJonathan&
at his request, & from the same motives
& no
other,then
lent him said hundred dollars. The defendants
further say that the said JonathanJonathan informed said WahrendorffWahrendorff
during the aforesaid trans-actions
that said Gilbert
& Coleman had got into adispute
that ColemanColeman wished to take him out of
the country & that GilbertGilbert intended to sue for
free-dom, but that as he JonathanJonathan knew that
Gil-bert
belonged to ColemanColeman, it would be best tosettle
the matter
amicably, & that it would be
best to make the said arrangement; and that it was right that
GilbertGilbert should pay for himself said
defendents further say that afterwards wait
on the twenty eighth of June in the same yearJames DuncanJames
Duncan the brother of ColemanColeman, called on
saidWahrendorffWahrendorff & borrowed on
the the
faith of said instrument a sum of money
& pledged the saidinstrument or bond of Jonathan &
Gilbert for the repayment of the same & that there is now
due from said DuncanDuncan to these defendants
for which said bond ispledged,
the sum of one hundred dollars: and that said defendants have been
notified that the balance due on said
Bond, has been transferred to James S.
Thomas and these defendants charge that
there was no nor fraud in said
transactions,
alledging that they were not of any that the purchase of Gilbert's
freedom was in their belief the result of a
a dispute between the master
and his have, which was compromised fairly at what
they understand to be an underprice for the slave
the saidGilbert & Jonathan his
brother choosing rath-er to pay the sum of four
hundred dollars, than to abide the result, & pay
the expenses, of a tedious suit: and to that
purport, the said JonathanJonathanexpressed
himself to the defendant WahrendorffWahrendorff. The defendants
further say that within a week after said bond was put into the defendant'shands to
secure said hundred dollars, said
Jona- than was notified of such
fact &
transfer at which time be made no
objection to paying the same. The defendants further say that said Tracy during all said
transactions was absent fromSt LouisSt.
Louis & knows nothing except from
hearsay & so makes the
above statements. And they suppose that
the instruments
copies of which are made exhibits in the Bill
of complaint were executed & that
said copies are correct but do not know & therefore do not
admit it Theybelieve said
ColemanColeman is not a resident of MissouriMissouri,
but do not know whether he is insolvent or
not but be-lieve & charge the the fact so to be that he is not
in-solvent.Nor do
these
defendants know whether saidGilbertGilbert
could have obtained his freedom from said Cole-man by suit,
but believe & charge that both
Jona-than & GilbertGilbert were
doubtful of the event, & chose rather than try
the experiment of a suit & pay theexpense &
submit to the delay, to compromise the claim to
freedom in the manner aforesaid: and
then
de--fendants deny any participation
in the transactionsdetailed in
said
Bill of Complaint other than as above
stated:
without that that there is any othermatter
or thing material or necessary for this
defendant to make answer unto and not
herein and hereby will and
sufficiently
answered unto, confessed or avoided
traversed or denied, is true,, all which matters
and things these
defendants Tracy & Wahrendorff are
ready to aver and prove as this honorable
Court shall direct andaward & humbly
prays to be hence with theirreasonable costs &
changes in their behalf most wrongfully
sustained
J SpaldingJ
Spalding for Tracy
&WahrendorffState of
MissouriMissouriCounty St LouisCounty of County St LouisStCounty St LouisLouis
ss
Edward TracyEdward Tracy &
CharlesCharles Wah-rendorff
being severally duly
sworn on their oaths respectively say
that the matters & things in
above answer
stated as of their own knowledge
are true
& those stated as matters of
or belief they
be-live to be true
Edwd. TracyChas WahrendorffSworn to & Subscribed to the A.No.
1.
(copy)
Ten months after date we
promise to pay to Coleman DuncanColeman
Duncan or order the sum of one
hundred
dollars: & twenty months after
date we promise to pay said ColemanColeman the
fur- ther sum of one hundred dollars &
thirty monthsafter
date we promise to pay said ColemanColeman thefurther
sum of one hundred dollars. The two last mentioned
serves to bear interest from thedate
hereofat the rate of six per cent per
an-num for value
received. This obligation however subject to
the following condition.
That whereas this instrument is
for the benefit of the under-signed
GilbertGilbert whose labor it is hoped will meet
there payments now if said GilbertGilbert shall die
or become from sickness or
accident permanentlyunable to work, at any
time within thirty
months from this date then only the
notable
proportion of the above sum shall be
paid, Witness our
hands and seals this25th. May 1830
Jonathan DuncanJonathan Duncan Gilbert DuncanSigned sealed
& delivered inpresence
of (after its being
read to JonathanJonathan(after its being readGilbertGilbertJ SpaldingJ
Spalding
No
Tracy
& Wahrendorff
&Coleman DuncanColeman Duncan Jonathan
& Gilbert
Answer of
Tracy & Wahrendorff
J SpaldingJ Spalding
for T &
WfiledApril
6th 1831Archibald GambleA Gamble
ClkCounty of St LouisCounty of St Louis ss
The MissouriState ofMissouriMissouriTo the Sheriff of S LouisS Louis County
Greeting
We
command you as we heretofore commanded you to
summonColeman DuncanColeman Duncan that he be
and appear before the Judge of our Circuit CourtCircuitCircuit CourtCourtsitting
as a Court of Chancery at the next term thereof
to be held at the City of S LouisS Louis within and for theCounty of S LouisCounty of S
Louis on the fourth monday of July next
then and there to answer the bill of Complaint of
JonathanJonathan and GilbertGilbert, free men of
color And have you then there this
writ
Witness Archibald GambleArchibald
Gamble Clerk of our said court at
office this 21st day of April
1831Archibald GambleArchibaldArchibald GambleGamble
Clk
Coleman DuncanColemanColeman DuncanDuncan not found in my County
John ShffJuly Term 1831Jonathan
Gilbert
vs
Coleman DuncanColemanColeman DuncanDuncan