St. Louis Circuit Court Legal Encoding Project
Digital Library Services

Title: Hester Williams, Priscilla Williams, and Mary Ella Williams, by and through their next friend, Jordan M. Early v. Frederick Norcum, et al.
Plaintiff: Williams, HesterWilliams, PriscillaWilliams, Mary Ella
Defendant: Norcum, FrederickMcAfee, A. B.Blakey, Granville C.Moore, William E.Loyden, Edmond
Date Filed: October 11, 1853
Term: November Term, 1853
Cause of Action: TrespassFalse ImprisonmentAssaultBattery
Case Number: 119
Court: St. Louis Circuit Court
Publication Info: St. Louis, Missouri: Washington University in St. Louis, University Libraries 2011
Source: The original document is part of the Missouri State Archives St Louis Circuit Court collection.
Availability: Documents are in the public domain

New YorkYork Oct 5th 1849

This is to certify, that negroe woman HesterHester & Children formerly my slaves in St LouisSt Louis, are free, and have all the rights to go where they please , that other coloured people have - They were set free by me in January last.

F.
HesterHester Williams Plff Pricilla Ella her children , by JordanJordan Early their next friend plff a B. Mc &fee FrederickFrederick Norcum Granville C Blakey Wm E Moore In the Circuit CourtCircuit Court of St. Louis County. St Louis County Sct. November Term 1853

Plaintiff states that on the day of January eighteen hundred and forty nine the defendant FrederickFrederick Norcum executed to the plaintiff a deed of manumis-sion for herself and her two children Pris-cilla who was the illegitimate child of the said defendant November, and May Ella WilliamsElla Williams the child by her late husband by which said deed she became free as well as both of her children the other plaintiff that on the seventh day of October 1853. She carried the said deed of manumission to the said Norcum at his request and plaintiffs charge that he destroyed the same; and had said plain-tiffs arrested and caused them to be delivered to A. B. McAfee and WilliamWilliam E Moore Granville C BlakeyBlakey the other defendant alledging that he had sold them to the said McAfeeMcAfee, and Blakey & Moore Plaintiffs further state that the defen-dant. Norcum in the month of October 1849 when plaintiff on charge of being runaway slaves were imprisoned and seized to the plaintiff the following certificate in word and figures as follows to wit.

New YorkYork. Oct. 5th 1849

This is to certify that negroe woman HesterHester & children formerly my slaves in St LouisSt. Louis are free and have all the rights to to go where they please that other coloured people have they were set free by me in January last.

(signed) F. Norcum

Thereby recognizing and ratifying the previous deed of manumission . all of which will man freely appear, by reference to the said certificate. marked (a) and made a part of this petition

Plaintiff further charge that the defen-dants McAfee & Blakey & Moore was before they purchased plaintiff (if they have purchased them) aware of all the facts set forth in this petition and of the freedom of the plaintiff. but not regarding their rights - both the said defendants with force and arms arrested the said plaintiffs. at the Circuit aforesaid on the 9th day of November October 1853. and then and there seized and laid laid hold of the said plaintiffs and with force and violence pulled and dragged about the said plaintiffs and then and there forced and compelled the said plaintiffs to go from and out of a certain public house situated and being in the county of St LouisSt. Louis into the public street there, and then and there forced and compelled them to go in and along several streets, to a certain negro jailsituated in the county aforesaid and owned and kept by the defendant McAfee, & Blakey Moore and then and there impris-oned the said plaintiff without any reasonable or probable cause whatsoever for a long space of time and against the will of plaintiffs.

Plaintiff further aver that before and at the time of committing the grievances complained of they were and still are free persons , and that the defendants held and still hold them in slavery

They therefore ask that the defendants be compelled to answer the allegations of this petition as specifically as if they were here again repeated by way of interogatory, and that upon a formal hearing of this case judgment of freedom may be awarded to your petitioners (the plaintiffs) and damages to the amount of five Hundred Dollar for which they ask judgment.

Blackburn & McLean Attys

JordanJordan M EarlyM M EarlyEarly for Priscilla WilliamsPriscilla Priscilla WilliamsWilliams and Ella WilliamsElla Ella WilliamsWilliams minors and for HesterHester WilliamsWilliams makes oath & says that he believes the matters & things stated in the foregoing petition as stated are true

J M Early Sworn to & subscribed before me this Oct 1853 M S CerreM S Cerre clk
Circuit CourtSt Louis Circuit Court

HesterHester Williams PriscillaWilliams Williams PriscillaPriscilla WilliamsWilliams by her next friend Early and Ella WilliamsElla Ella WilliamsWilliams by her next friend M EarlyM M EarlyEarly vs G. B.

Petition in trespass for Freedom B & McLean Attys
To the Clerk of the Circuit CourtCircuit Court

The petition of Priscilla and MaryMary Ella WilliamsElla Ella WilliamsWilliams children of HesterHester WilliamsWilliams ask the appointment of JordanJordan M EarlyM M EarlyEarly as their next friend to enable them to bring a suit for their freedom against FrederickFrederick Norcum and A. B. Macaffe .

Priscilla WilliamsPriscilla Williams Mary Ellen Priscilla WilliamsWilliams

I consent to act as next friend for Priscilla WilliamsPriscilla Priscilla WilliamsWilliams and MaryMary Ella WilliamsElla Ella WilliamsWilliams minors in suit about to be instituted by them for freedom against Norcum & Macaffe

St LouisSt. Louis Oct 11th 1853 J M Early

I approve the within and appoint JordanJordan N Early, as next friend to sue for the plaintiffs in said cause

M S CerreM S M S CerreCerre Clk Cir Ct
County of St LouisCounty of St. Louis, Ss. The MissouriState of Missouri, To the Sheriff of St. Louis County, Greeting:

We command you to summon A B McAfeeA B A B McAfeeMcAfee and FrederickFrederick Norcum Glenville BlakeyBlakey and WilliamWilliam E Moore to appear before the Judge of our Circuit CourtCircuit Court, on the first day of the next term thereof, to be held in the City of St LouisCity of St. Louis, within and for the County of St LouisCounty of St. Louis, on the third Monday of November next: then and there to answer the complaint of HesterHester Williams PriscillaWilliams Williams PriscillaPriscilla WilliamsWilliams and Ella WilliamsElla Williams by their next friend JordanJordan M EarlyM Early as set forth in the annexed petition and have you then and there this writ.

Witness, Michael S CerreMichael S. Cerre, Clerk of said Court, with the Seal thereof hereto affixed, at office in the City of St LouisCity of St. Louis, this eleventh day of October in the year of our Lord eighteen hundred and fifty three M S CerreM S Cerre Clerk.

I acknowledge myself bound for all costs that may accrue in the above cause. Witness, my hand and seal, at St LouisSt. Louis, this 11th day of October 1853

J W Early
L.S.

On reading & considering the within petition it is ordered that said petitioners be allowed to sue on and giving Se-curity satisfactory to the Clerk for all costs that may be adjudged against petitioners, and it is further ordered that said petitioners have reasonable liberty, to attend Counsel and the Court as occasion may require that they be not removed out of the jurisdiction of the Court and they be not subject to any severity on account of their application for freedom

A True Copy attest Alexander HamiltonA. Hamilton Judge 8th Jud. Cir MO M S CerreM. S. M S CerreCerre Clk.
No. 119 Circuit CourtSt. Louis Circuit Circuit CourtCourt November Term 1853

HesterHester Williams PriscillaWilliams, Ella WilliamsElla Ella WilliamsWilliams Williams PriscillaPriscilla WilliamsWilliams by their next friend JordanJordan M EarlyM Early vs A B McAfeeA B A B McAfeeMcAfee and G. C. Blakey Fred. Norcum William Moore Pet for freedom Mc Lean

Issued Oct 11th 1853 Md CerreCerre Jury fee & writ $3. his by J M Early Copy $1.50

Executed this writ in the County of St LouisCounty of County of St LouisSt. Louis on the 12th day of Oct. 1853 by leaving a certified copy of the writ & petition at the usual place of abode of A. B. McAfee with a white person a member of his family over the age of fifteen years - also by leaving a copy of the within writ, at the usual place of abode of Granville Blakey, with a white person a member of the family, over the age of fifteen years - FrederickFrederick Norcum not found in my county.

Jn M. Wimer by Jm C BlakeyBlakey dept Service 2.00 Non est 50 $ 2.50

Executed this writ further in the county of St LouisSt. Louis on the 12th day of Oct. 1853. by delivering a certified copy of the within writ to Wm E. Moore & by offering to read the within petition to him which he refuses to hear fee $1.00 Jn M Wimer Shff

State of Mo County of St LouisCounty of St Louis In the Circuit CourtSt Louis Circuit CourtCircuit Court- Nov Term 1834 HesterHester WilliamsWilliams & others. vs FrederickFrederick Norcum &c

Declaration under statute for freedom

Defendant for plea to the amended declaration filed in the above case on 20th November 1834, says, that he is not guilty of the trespass and imprisonment as charged in the said declaration; and defendant denies that plaintiffs were ever or are now free persons, and of these things he puts himself upon the County

Willis L Williams Atty for Deft
No 119 In the Circuit CourtSt Louis Circuit Court

HesterHester WilliamsWilliams & others vs FrederickFrederick Norcum

Answer of defendant to amended declaration filed 20th Nov 1834. Plea not guilty & that plaintiff not free

Filed November 24, 1854 William J HammondWm William J HammondJ Hammond Clk WilliamsWilliams p.d
In the Circuit CourtSt Louis Circuit Court. November Term 1854 HesterHester WilliamsWilliams & others vs FrederickFrederick Norcum

1st. Defendant moves to strike from the record, , the paper marked "filed Nov. 20th 1854.," for the reason

1. That said paper is not filed in accordance with, but directly in derogation of the rule of this court.

2. The said paper is not an amendment of the original petition, nor is it a petition itself, for freedom, as the suit purports to be.

3. The said paper is not an frivolous and of no sort of application to the matters in issue.

2. Defendant asks the court to make an order that the Sheriff deliver the plaintiffs to the defendant NorcomNorcom or his agent, to be dealt with as his slaves

Willis L Williams p.d.

HesterHester WilliamsWilliams & others vs Frederick Norcom

Motion to strike paper marked "filed Nov. 20 1854" from - and for final order in the case.

Filed November 24, 1854 Wm J.Hammond Clk WilliamWilliam p.d.
Court House Papers St LouisSt. Louis To the Judge of the Circuit CourtSt. Louis Circuit Court of the County of St LouisCounty of St. Louis and MissouriState of MissouriMissouri

The petition of HesterHester WilliamsWilliams humbly represents, that in January D 1849 she known by the name of H Esther was the slave for life of F Norcum and also has two children one a girl aged now five years named MaryMary Ella and the other afore named Priscilla aged nine years. And that at said time her then Master F Norcum, set her free by granting to her and her two children a deed of Emancipation, and your petitioner represents that said as she was informed and has a force once free discharged from ser-vice of herself and her the children and your petitioners further charges that she retained said deed of Emancipation in her possession from the day of its Execution some time in January 1849 up and untill on or about the seventh of October AD 1853 when she at the request of the said NorcomNorcom him the deed to have the same recorded as he was informed that some further act had to be done by the said NorcomNorcom , before the said paper could be recorded, and your petitioner states that said NorcomNorcom told her to come back on the next morn ing & he would give her the said papers properly recorded and certified, and petitioner states that when she came to the said NorcomNorcom for said paper that she was informed that she was together with her two children sold by the said Norcum to one A. B. Macafee a negro trader by whom she was taken possession of and is now confined in his negro yard in the city of St LouisSt. Louis, and is informed and verily believes that the said Macafee intends forthwith to remove her without the limits of this state , and jurisdiction of this court

Your petitioner further states that in October 1849 and after the execution of the deed of Emancipation she was as a runaway , and F Norcum then who was in the city of New YorkYork sent to her to procure her released the certificate hereunto attached & made a part of this petition

And your petitioner prays that an order may be permited by your Honor to allow her to sue as a poor person she having means & that your Honor will also permit an order that she may have reasonable liberty to attend her counsel and the the Court as may require and that a warrant may issue for your petitioner the and that she may have such relief as well as the law provides and the necessity of the case .

HesterHester WilliamsWilliams by Blackburn & McLean her attys.

Milton N. McLean being duly sworn saith that he nelieves the matters & things set forth in the foregoing petition are true and there makes an order is granted by the Circuit CourtCircuit Court that said HesterHester and her two children Ella & Priscilla Martha command one of the presentence of the Court

Sworn to & subscribed before me this 11th Oct 1853

M S CerreM. S. Cerre Clk M. N. McLean

On reading and considering the within petition it is ordered that the said petitioners be allowed to sue on giving security to the clerk for all costs that may be payment petitioners

And it is further ordered that said petitioner has reasonable liberty to attend counsel and the Court as may require . That they be not removed out of the jurisdiction of the court, and that they be not subject to any severity on account of their application for freedom

St LouisSt Louis Oct 11th

Alexander HamiltonA. Hamilton Jug o 8th Judicial Cir. Mo

75

Petiton of HesterHester WilliamsWilliams Known as HesterHester and Ella & Priscilla

Filed October 11th 1853 M S CerreM. S. Cerre Clk

Nov. Term 1853. Demurrer to petition filed. 24 p 82. Demurrer sustd leave to amend on or before the first day of next term 24 p 114. April 2 1854 Declaration under the statute filed. 24 p 128. Cont by Consent 4 p 142 Motion to strike out paper filed & sustained & motion for final order filed & overruled Leave to to amend on or before the first day of next term 24 p 298. November Term 1854 Amended Declaration filed 24 p 319. Motion to strike out filed and orvrd with leave to plead. plea filed 24 p 342 contd as on affidavit of pltf to procure testimony of Fred Norcum 24 p 484. Dedimus to New YorkYork. by plaintiff 24 p 497. Oct. 5 '55 Contd 25 p 206. March 3 '56. April 17. & Judgt of freedom plaintiff to pay costs 25 p 372.

Court House Papers St. Louis State of MissouriMissouri County of St LouisSt. Louis The MissouriState of Missouri

M. N. McLean having sworn saith that HesterHester WilliamsWilliams and her two children Priscilla & Ella are in the custody of one EdmundEdmond Loyden who he maintains & believes is the against of A. B. Mc Affe and Granville & Blakey partners trading in negros in the city of St LouisSt. Louis and who has the said negros in change at the instance of FrederickFrederick Norcum sworn to & subscribed before me this 12 Oct 1853.

B J Hammond Clk M. N. McLean
To the Circuit CourtCircuit Court of St. Louis County

M. N. McLean moves to amend the petition for to same filed on behalf of HesterHester WilliamsWilliams & her children against FrederickFrederick Norcum and A B McAfeeA B A B McAfeeMcAfee by adding thereto the names of Granville C Blakey & Edmond Loyden the said Loyden being the agent of McAfee & Blakey

St LouisSt. Louis Oct 12 1853 Blackburn & McLean Attys
State of MissouriMissouri County of St LouisCounty of St Louis The MissouriState of Missouri to the Sheriff of the County of St LouisCounty of St Louis Greeting

You are hereby commanded to seize HesterHester . Ella & Priscilla known as HesterHester WilliamsWilliams & her two children where ever they may be found and bring them before me at the Court House in the room of the Circuit CourtCircuit Court at the Court House on the 12th day of Oct 1853 at 9 O'clock and to summon A B McAfeeA A B McAfeeB McAfee in whose possession they now are to appear at the same time and place

Given under my hand this 11th day of October 1853

Alexander HamiltonA Hamilton Judge 8th Judi-cial Cir. Mo.

Executed the within order from the Honr. Alex Hamilton, by having the within named parties in court on the 12th day of October 1853.

AB. Mc.Afee not found.

Fee $3.00

non est 0.50

$3.50

Jn. M Wimer Shff
State of MissouriMissouri County of St LouisCounty of St. Louis Sheriff of St. Louis County To the MissouriState of Missouri to the Greeting

You are hereby Commanded to seize HesterHester Ella & Priscilla known as HesterHester WilliamsWilliams & her two children where ever they may be found, and bring them before me at the Court House in the Room of the Criminal Court at the Court house. on the 13th day of Oct 1853 at 9 O. Clock A. M. and to sieze msr A. B. McAfee Granville C. BlakeyBlakey and EdmundEdmond Loyden Wim C MooreMoore in whose possession they now are to appear at the same time and place

Given under my hand this 12th day of October 1853.

Courthose Papers St LouisSt. Louis Alexander HamiltonA Hamilton Jud 8th Ju-dicial Cir . Mo

Executed the within order on the 13th of October 1853, by having, HesterHester, Ella and Priscilla before the Hon Alex Hamilton, & by summoning Wm E. Moore to appear in court at 9. 0'clock a.m on this day- A. B. McAfee. Granville C Blakey & Edward Loyden not found.

Fee # 4.00

1.50

# 5.50

. M Shrff
In this circuit court Novr. Term 1853

HesterHester Williams PriscillaWilliams Williams PriscillaPriscilla Williams & Ella WilliamsWilliams against

Defendant NorcomNorcom by his attorney comes and demurrs to the Plaintiffs' petition filed in the above entitled cause that the facts alleged as stated in said petition are not sufficient to entitle in behalf authorize the judgement asked for by the Petitioners

Willis L Williams pd Court House Papers St LouisSt. Louis

HesterHester WilliamsWilliams & others vs FrederickFrederick Norcum & others

Demurrer to Plffs petition

Filed, February 24, 1854 William J HammondWm J. Hammond Clk
Court House Papers Circuit CourtSt. Louis State of MissouriMissouri County of St LouisCounty of St. Louis St LouisSt. Louis Circuit CourtCircuit Circuit CourtCourt November Term 1854

Ella WilliamsElla Ella WilliamsWilliams and Priscilla WilliamsPriscilla Williams by them next for Early and HesterHester WilliamsWilliams Plaintiffs vs FrederickFrederick Norcum Granville Blakey A B McAfeeA B A B McAfeeMcAfee and WilliamWilliam E Moore Declaration under the statute for Freedom

Ella WilliamsElla Williams and Priscilla WilliamsPriscilla Williams minors by their next friend JordanJordan M EarlyM M EarlyEarly and HesterHester WilliamsWilliams complains of the above named defendants of a plea wherefore the said defendants with force and arms made an assault upon the said plaintiffs viz on the seventh of October AD 1853 at St LouisSt. Louis on the county and State aforesaid the said and then & there beat, bruised & ill treated them & each of them and then & there imprisoned them & kept & detained them in prison without any reasonable or probable cause, whatsoever for a long time to wit for the space of ten hours then next following contrary to the laws & customs of this state the said plaintiffs then & there being free and being free for a long space of time previous thereto viz for the period of one year, and still being free persons tho the said defendants held and still hold plaintiffs in slavery.

And other wrongs to the said plaintiffs then & there did to the great damage of the said plaintiffs and against the peace Wherefore the said plaintiffs say they have sustained damages in the sum of one thousand dollars & therefore they sue

by Blackburn & McLean P attys

75 Circuit CourtCircuit Court

HesterHester WilliamsWilliams & others vs FrederickFrederick Norcum & others

Declaration under the statute

B. & McLean Attys Filed April 17, 1854 William J HammondWm. J. Hammond Clk
Court House Papers St LouisSt. Louis In the Circuit CourtSt. Louis Circuit Court April Term A D 1854

HesterHester WilliamsWilliams & others vs A. B. McAfee FrederickFrederick Norcum & others

1 The defendants move to strike from the record the paper marked as “filed April 17th 1854” for the reasons

1. That said paper is not filed in accordance with, but directly in derogation of the rules of this Court.

2. The said paper is frivolous and of no sort of application to the matters in issue.

3. The said paper is not an amendment of the original petition, nor is it a petition itself for freedom, as the suit pretends to be.

2 Defendants ask the Court to make an order that the Sheriff deliver the plaintiffs to the defendant NorcomNorcom or his agent, to be dealt with as his slaves &c.

Willis L. Williams Atty for Defendants

No. 119

HesterHester WilliamsWilliams & others Vs A. B. McAfee .

Motion to strike paper from the record & for said order.

WilliamsWilliams Atty pd

Filed June 27, 1854 Hammond Clk 57 75
Court House Papers Circuit CourtSt. Louis State of MissouriMissouri County of St LouisCounty of St. Louis Circuit CourtCircuit Court of St. Louis County April Term 1854 Amended Declaration

Ella WilliamsElla Williams PriscillaWilliams , Williams PriscillaPriscilla Ella WilliamsWilliams by JordanJordan M EarlyM. M EarlyEarly their next friend and HesterHester WilliamsWilliams persons of color complains of FrederickFrederick Norcum of a plea. For that the said defendant on the day of AD 1854 with force and arms &c made an assault upon the said plaintiffs to wit at St LouisSt. Louis in the county aforesaid & then & there beat, bruised & ill treated them & each of them the said plaintiffs & then & there imprisoned them & & each of them the said plaintiffs & kept & detained them & each of them in prison there without any reasonable or probable cause whatsoever for a long time viz for the space of twelve hours then next following contrary to the laws of the said State and the will of the said plaintiffs And the said plaintiff avers that before and at the time of the committing of the said grievances they were each one of them and still are free persins & that the said defendant held & still holds them in slavery to the plaintiffs damages damages in the sum of ten dollars & therefore they pray

by Blackburn & McLean Plff Attys
75 Circuit CourtCircuit Court

Ella WilliamsElla Williams PriscillaWilliams & Williams PriscillaPriscilla Ella WilliamsWilliams by their next friend JordanJordan M Early & HesterHester Williams vs FrederickFrederick Norcum

Amended Declaration

B & McLean Attys Filed Nov. 20th 1854 William J HammondWm. J. Hammond clk
Court House Papers St. Louis. County of St LouisSt. Louis, Ss. The MissouriState of Missouri, To Saml Glover Thos Harvey Phillip C Morehead John C. RichardsonRichardson Greeting.

You are hereby Commanded, that, setting aside all manner of excuse and delay. you appear before our Circuit CourtCircuit Court for the County aforesaid, on the 13th July at the City of St LouisCity of St. Louis, then and there to testify, and the truth to say in a certain matter of controversy now pending in our said Court, wherein WilliamsWilliams is plaintiff and McAfeeMcAfee & Norcum is defendant on the part of Plaintiff and herein you are in no wise to fail.

Witness, William J HammondWilliam J. Hammond, Clerk of our said Court, with the seal thereof hereto affixed, at office, in the City of St LouisCity of St. Louis, this 8th day of July in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and fifty-five William J HammondWm J. Hammond Clerk C. C.
Circuit CourtCircuit Court 75

WilliamsWilliams vs McAfeeMcAfee & Norcum Spa for

Saml Glover Esq

Thos Harvey Esq John C. RichardsonRichardson Phillip C. Morehead

Executed by reading to J. C. Richardson & P. C. Morehead , in St Louis County February 12/55 S. Glover & Thos Harvey not found.

Fee $120

Turner MaddoxTurner Turner MaddoxMaddox shff By Chas Picker Dpty
Court House Papers St. Louis County of St LouisSt. Louis, Ss. The MissouriState of Missouri, To ThomasThomas HarveyHarvey Greeting:

You are hereby Commanded, that, setting aside all manner of execuse and delay, you appear before our Circuit CourtCircuit Court for the County aforesaid, on the ever at the City of St LouisCity of St. Louis, then and there to testify, and the truth to in a certain matter of controversy now pending in our said Court, wherein HesterHester WilliamsWilliams et al are plaintiff and Fr. Norcum and others defendant on the part of Plaintiffs: and herein you are in no wise to fail

Witness, William J HammondWilliam J. Hammond, Clerk of our said Court, with the seal thereof hereto affixed, at office, in the City of St LouisCity of St. Louis, this 12th, day of Feby in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and fifty-five William J HammondWm J. Hammond Clerk C. C.

75

HesterHester WilliamsWilliams vs McAfeeMcAfee et al

ThomasThos HenryHenry

pltff

ThomasThos HenryHenry the within named not found. Feb 12th 1855

Fee 10 cts

Turner MaddoxTurner Maddox shff By J. B. Hegdon Dpty
Part House Papers St. Louis County of St LouisSt. Louis, Ss. The MissouriState of Missouri, To Cicero S. Hawks, WilliamWilliam DeWitt William SmithWilliam Smith & B. M. Lynch & Thomas S. HarveyHarvey Greeting:

You are hereby Commanded, that, setting aside all manner of excuse and delay, you appear before our Circuit CourtCircuit Court for the County aforesaid, on the 17th day of April 1856 at the City of St LouisCity of St. Louis, then and there to testify, and the truth to say in a certain matter of controvery now pending in our said Court, wherein HesterHester WilliamsWilliams et al. by next friend &c are plaintiffs and McAfeeMcAfee & others are defendantss on the part of said plaintiffs and herein you are in no wise to fail.

Witness, William J HammondWilliam J. Hammond, Clerk of our said Court, with the seal thereof hereto affixed, at office, in the City of St LouisCity of St. Louis, this 15th day of April in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and fifty-six William J HammondWm J Hammond Clerk C. C.

De Witt & SmithSmith not found Executed as to others within name April 17/56

Fee $120

Turner MaddoxTurner Turner MaddoxMaddox Shff By Chas Picker Depy

75 (119 17 act. Nov. T. 53)

57 Trials Mar. T/56

In Circuit CourtCircuit Court (for April 17th)

Subp'a for Plffs

HesterHester WilliamsWilliams vs McAfeeMcAfee &c

Bishop C. S. Hawks

Wm De Smith (on B.T. "Tropic")

Wm Smith (8th bet. & Elm)

B. M. Lynch (Locust bet. 4th & 5th)

Thos S. Harbey
Court House Papers St LouisSt. Louis

Upon the evidence in this case plaintiff is not entitled to recover